|
I can easily
imagine that the multicontextual approach taken to an unprecedented level on
this website may seem like free association on steroids to new
visitors. But as I wrote before,
there is a big difference between just banging on the piano and
playing harmonious music on the piano. It is the latter that enables
one to resonate with the future or probabilities - in a tangible
enough manner. Tangible, like anticipating
the timing and conceptual theme of Hurricane Katrina and the New
Orleans 'Great Flood' which was a major 'Sun-king Judgment' event.
(Just the latest example.) By being 'multicontextual', it becomes possible to flesh out
trans-temporal threads that may be traced from the past, through the
present, and into the future, thereby the shape of the future may be
made more defined. We are normally driving a car looking only at the
rear-view mirror... which is quite unnatural and dangerous. Strange
if you think about it, but such is the nature of being a biological
creature inhabiting a physical world. Multicontextual
thinking may seem 'out there' but, as I see it, it's actually a path
to becoming more natural in terms of reducing the area of our
blind spot that is biologically programmed into our being. The
'normal' perspective is a functional but contextually-trapped way of operating in
this reality putting much more emphasis on the past (i.e. empirical)
than the future which is basically wide open spaces literally full
of possibilities. Multicontextuality is basically the reverse in its
intrinsic emphasis; it resists the formulation of any rigid context as much as possible instead of upholding a
(theoretical) context as long as possible as is the case when in the
former/'normal' mode. Most people are culturally
'trained' to mentally operate in that contextually-fixed, past-driven
mode, and for them to 'go
multicontextual' is like suddenly having gravity turned off under
their feet, which would quickly confuse and frustrate them. They want to feel they are in control and that they
know what's going on, even if it's an illusion. As biological
beings existing in a harsh physical world with its own seemingly
unbending rules, we are naturally wired to adapt to the surrounding environment and make assumptions that would speed up the
mind reaching a plausible conclusion which in turn would aid us in our
physical survival. But by accepting this 'force of evolution' without
putting up any sort of conscious resistance, we become more and more
'programmed'... thus we in effect become more and more like a machine. Machines
operate in a contextually inflexible mode; they are
context-dependent and they are incapable of going beyond that
programmed frame of reference.
They need to have a fixed context - or an 'operating system' -
otherwise all the applications running on it will stop working. So just as
Microsoft releasing a new version of the 'Windows' operating system can
annoy users whose favorite computer programs may stop working in the
new 'paradigm', the machine
people - the 'Borg' - also resist change ( the shifting of the
context/paradigm) like their lives depend on it. Their mind has made a
set of assumptions to feel comfortable and not think; their
programmed thinking process, and in effect their existence itself,
became dependent on that model; and in so doing they have set
themselves up for an eventual and inevitable ' system crash'. Their
survival would come to mean protecting the context, or the
paradigm, or ultimately their assumptions. It is anti-truth.
But when it comes to the force of truth, ironically, 'resistance is
futile'. The more you resist, the more you suffer and ultimately, as
the 'dam' collapses, perish in a 'Great Flood' that is the 'system
crash'. The
multicontextual approach is the opposite. It always looks for a way to
get out of a fixed context, because to be fixed in a context is to
assume the omnipotence of the context and thereby limit one's
perspective. Any conclusions derived from a data set that ignores any
set of variables because of contextual compatibility issues (or 'ego') are inherently defective and a 'time bomb'
just waiting
to go off and bring things back into equilibrium. To ignore
possibilities in order to formulate a comfortable conclusion is to disrespect
truth, and that is what ultimately sets up the storyline of
'Judgment Day'. The more we fight and reject possibilities, the more severely
we'll be 'judged'; or, in a sense, we bring the Judgment to
ourselves
by siding with our biologically-driven, survivalistic, and
pleasure-seeking 'ego' rather than truth. As long as our
primary concern in life is our physical survival, we are screwed.
Simple as that. It's sometimes unavoidable, but to get stuck in that
mode without fighting it is a sure way to become functionally insane.
A serious psychological disease that should be treated that way
and hopefully we will in the not-so distant future. Physicality
or physical existence itself is a form of imbalance on a
fundamental level, as the constant 'flow' of gravity and time is
always gently reminding us. Therefore to assume that we are, or can be, in balance in this
physical realm is to deny the very nature of our existence. We are always
out of balance here, hence the existence of 'time', and knowingly or
not we are in a continuous battle with a 'force' that is attempting
to restore that balance. Or, at least, we are caught between two
sides in a great war - i.e. between the biological, 'survival of the fittest' force
(aka 'nature') and the 'spiritual' force always seeking balance/
truth (which is multi-contextual/dimensional). We have both in our
being and can choose to align with one, consciously or not. Most
are just going back and forth between them like the tides of
the ocean, not even realizing that there are these opposing forces operating
just below the threshold of consciousness. The great battle is in
effect 'invisible', but we certainly see its reflections or ripples
getting expressed in our physical reality one way or another...
everyday, every moment. It's the 'as above, so below' principle permeating
the whole space-time matrix. By
becoming conscious of the 'battle' and by choosing to become an active
participant in it, instead of staying an unwitting pawn in the great
game, we can cause a great shift to take place in the matrix, or
perhaps even end it. The 'end of time'. It's how 'time' can
snap
back into superposition, into the sea of pure possibilities, instead
of a directionally fixed river of time. 
Multicontextuality,
a philosophically expressed multi-dimensionality, is in a way a form
of an attempt to bring about this 'revolution' in the 'matrix'... the
Time River. By reversing our biologically and socially induced thought
patterns, in effect 'reversing time', we would have ourselves aligned
with the side of balance/truth, or the force of 'Maat'. We'd align
ourselves with 'heaven', i.e. that which is greater than our
biological being. A 'Star Child' is thus born. 
You're
either with heaven, or you're with the Terra-ist. Terra/Earth here
being an expression of the contextually-challenged perspective of
physicality. Of
course, there is beauty in the marriage of heaven and earth. The
beauty of the Holy Grail - the product of the sacred marriage of Jesus
and Mary Magdalene, to use biblical terminology. And as can be inferred from the nature of the
Grail, a holy relic representing the ultimate secret and the ultimate
exit door or the ultimate bridge through which we can enter the 'other
side' or the 'next level', it is hidden and a form of initiation
that vigorously tests those who come its way before its power may be
allowed to be
harnessed. It
just quietly sits there - which is somehow enough for it to set into
motion a great 'revolution'. The Grail does not seek publicity or
advertise itself because it knows it is what it is, with or without recognition,
which is truth regardless of the level of acceptance. It is
there and won't go away because truth permeates the whole of the
fabric of all dimensions of which our physical reality is but a small
part. The Grail just is, and waits. It
comes into the room, bows its head, sits, and meditates without making
any noise. When asked a question, it responds in riddles, because it
knows there is no answer to be given except that which lurks within
each of us waiting to be recognized. Thus causing one to question is
the beginning of the Initiation. The Grail, the Monolith, the Giza
monuments, are the mystery placed in our realm designed to
generate questions, and that is the greatest gift ever given to
mankind. The magical potential lies dormant but was given. It was
seeded and we were given the potential to give birth to the Star
Child. It
just sits there quietly - but omnipotently generating and guiding the
path of the river of time...
The
power is great and everything powerful in this realm of imbalance
begets corruption. Thus Babylon the Gate of God turns into Babylon the
source of great corruption. It's a universal theme. 
A
man curious enough comes and asks the Grail a question and he is led
to uncover a great secret himself. He then begins to share the insights with
others. People begin to become his 'followers' and he grows powerful. He then
begins to use the knowledge and power to serve himself - instead of
truth. Drunk with power, he wishes to control the world and satisfy
his ego. Some people see this and equate his knowledge of the hidden -
the 'occult' - with his dark human nature. They conclude this is what
the hidden knowledge is all about. They create a society to oppose
any such initiatory knowledge that causes corruption. And the source
of it all, the Grail, the Monolith, Lucifer, or by any other name,
comes to be viewed as the embodiment of 'evil'. Then
that corrupt leader
along with those he helped initiate into the mystery goes underground
- not all of them are corrupt. The anti-Mystery group goes on to
inflate the 'evilness' of their perceived enemy who is now less
visible. The anti-Mystery group, now
powerful but confused and incapable of discerning the true source of
corruption, also becomes corrupt themselves. Seeing this, some of the
next generation express their rebellious spirit by going to the other
side - that is, the imaginary 'occult' culture of 'Satanists' and 'Luciferians'.
Through this misguided group the imaginary 'Satanic' culture actually, however
lame, comes into existence. Some would call themselves the
'Illuminati' and congratulate themselves for being so mysterious and
dark. Seeing this, the anti-Mystery group goes 'Ah ha!
There they are - blood-drinking, human-sacrificing followers of
Satan!'. And
the lame cycle goes on and on... All the while the Grail sits quietly
deep in meditation, fully aware of the power of its knowledge and what
it does when mixed with predictable human nature... So
it just sit there quietly... until a 'stargate' is to be activated at
the 'end of time'... to turn base metal into gold. The alchemical
transformation from the Iron Age into the Golden Age.
Now, I happen to have
this 'river of time' scheme all mapped out in my 'Time
River Theory' which treats the world's longest river (arguably),
the Nile, as the literal 'river time' that encodes the timeline of
human history (and more) into its geodetic design, part of which are
the Giza monuments... standing at the northern edge of this alchemical
Time River at 30°N where the river splits into many channels.
The 'end of
time' point in the encoded timeline is the 21 century...
or this century. This is where time goes through a 'stargate'
and jumps to another ancient Time River in Mesopotamia, the Tigris-Euphrates
whose mouth is at the 'stargate latitude' of 30°N. The
Tigris-Euphrates flows southward - the opposite of the Nile's water
that flows directly northward. Time, in effect, is 'turned back' here and
goes back to the 'Golden Age' - an idea magically expressed by the
overlay scheme of the Time River design which we won't go into here.
As far as the Time
River Theory is concerned, it is no coincidence that the Great
Sphinx's gaze is eternally fixed due east toward the mouth/ 'stargate'
of the Tigris-Euphrates. It is quietly telling us where 'time' jumps
to
after reaching that magical latitude... guarded by this mysterious monument time itself fears. 
The
Great Sphinx is traditionally considered a form of Horus (Horatkhi
or 'Horus in the Horizon') and according to Greek tradition the sphinx
was a combination of Leo's body (lion) and Virgo's head (virgin) or,
to use ancient Egyptian terminology, a mixture of Horus/Osiris and
Isis; and more biblically, Jesus and Mary. The Sphinx, then, can
easily be considered a from of... the Grail.
Mars is another
form of Horus - 'Horus the Red' - and it cannot be mere coincidence
that Cairo, the present capital of Egypt right next to Giza, was given
a name that basically means 'Mars'. But more specifically, there is
the so-called 'Face on Mars' in the Cydonia region.
Recent
photographs of the 'Face' taken by NASA's Mars Global Surveyor
(I think it was) revealed the enigmatic landform to be less face-like
than first thought from Viking images. The sharper
image, however, actually did much to reinforce Richard C. Hoagland's theory that
the 'Face' might be a combination of a hominid and leonine heads,
split vertically at the center.
Even
going beyond that, it was then revealed on this Etemenanki
website years ago that the
mirrored 'hominid head' was more like a headless 'human torso'... not
just a torso but a pregnant one!
Thus mirroring each side of the 'Face'
gave us a lion head and a
pregnant body - or a combination of Leo's head and Virgo's body
(expressing the 'messianic' virgin impregnation) just like the
(reverse of the) traditional form of the Greek sphinx. That
there was this Earth-Mars connection was corroborated by the
encoded proportional design...
...as well as by the
fact that the tangent of the Cydonia monuments' latitude equals the
cosine of Giza's latitude - both being e/pi. The
'Face on Mars', then, is a Sphinx... and a Grail! Another
key factor here is this legend
famously attached to the Greek sphinx:
Hera or Ares sent the
Sphinx from her Ethiopian homeland (for the Greeks remembered the Sphinx's foreign origins) to sit outside Thebes and
ask all passersby history's most famous riddle: "Which creature in the morning goes on four feet, at noon on two, and in the evening upon three?" She strangled anyone unable to
answer. The word "sphinx" comes from the Greek Σφιγξ, Sphinx, apparently from the verb σφιγγω, sphingo, meaning "to strangle". Oedipus solved the riddle:
man – he crawls on all fours as a baby, then walks on two feet as an adult, and walks with a cane in old age. Bested at last, the Sphinx then threw herself from her high rock and died.
As discussed in Stargate
Cipher 2012: On August 13, '04, we detected in the opening
ceremony of the Athens Olympics a surprisingly
clear reference to the Sphinx/Face; and at the same time there was Hurricane Charley making
landfall in Florida... a hurricane whose name means 'man' - as
if to give the 'right answer' to the 'Sphinx riddle' being asked in
Athens!
Not
only that, the same opening show also prominently featured a pregnant
woman who near the end 'gave birth' to a 'messianic child' in the form
of a 'enlightened' DNA double-helix 
All
these were also collectively a clear
enough allusion to Mission To Mars - the only major
Hollywood film to directly deal with the issue of... the 'Face on Mars' and
a genetic connection between Mars and Earth.  
Mission To Mars even gives the Face a sphinx-like nature as the
monument is shown to test
the approaching human explores with a 'riddle', the
answer to which turns out to be the DNA makeup of human beings, or in
other words... man - just like in the Greek legend of the
sphinx! But
before the right answer is given, the Face/Sphinx kills many of the astronauts
by unleashing a violent twister - which of course was mimicked by Hurricane
Charley ('Man') striking Florida on the day of the Olympic show.
This
may be labeled 'Judgment at the Threshold', the threshold being
analogous to the 'end of time' latitude marked by the Great Sphinx,
30° North. We are being asked 'who are you?', and unless we know who
we are... well, you know the story. 'Know thy self' is then not a mere
oracular advice... it seems to be a demand at this critical
time in human history. And
who are we indeed? Where did we come from? Where is our
Genesis? And where do we end up going through the stargate of the
Grail? 
Certainly
there were enough hints transmitted during the Olympic 'ritual' in Athens. Mars and the Grail
(Mary Magdalene/'MM') - this is where the 'game' is going.
Doesn't matter no one else is talking about this yet... That
won't be the case in five years. In
the mean time, with another hurricane coming to the forefront and destroying New Orleans
just weeks ago, we sense that the Questioning is definitely continuing
and that we are collectively failing the test so far. We are at a
crossroads now. Just as August 13 highlighted by the Olympics and Hurricane Charley was a feast day of the witchcraft
goddess Hecate closely identified with crossroads, the name 'Katrina'
has been theorized to derive from... Hecate. (And there are
more crossroads association attached
to Katrina.) Not only that, the day of Katrina's landfall (8/29) was
the anniversary of the closing ceremony of the Athens Olympics
that featured a big 'Wizard of Oz' spiral which would certainly be
associated with a twister/hurricane... 
...And,
as pointed out by an Etemenankian, Linnie, August 29 is also... none other
than 'Judgment Day' itself in Terminator
2: Judgment Day.
The
Terminator connection even extends to cover the time
reversal/time travel aspect of the latitude of the Great Sphinx in the
Time River Theory. And where is New Orleans relative to that stargate
latitude? There is nothing relative about it: New Orleans IS on
that
stargate latitude (30°N)! The gaze of the Great Sphinx, in other
words, passes directly through the site of the American Great Flood!
(New Orleans is also on 90°W longitude, the 'anchor meridian' of
the Mississippi River.) 
What's
more, New Orleans is known as 'the Crescent City', making it
comparable to a crescent moon. The line on the Moon separating
the dark side and the illuminated side is astronomically known
as the terminator. Add to that the fact that the American
'Great Flood' began not on 8/29 but 8/30 and the emergency peak
situation continued through 9/2 - August 31 particularly being a key number based
on various time codes. August 31 was the eighth anniversary of
Princess Diana's death - 'Diana' being the name of a Roman Moon
goddess; and the same was also the anniversary of Arnold
Schwarzenegger - i.e. the Terminator himself - making his
career-making speech at the pre-election Republican National Convention
in NYC. The climax of the RNC came on 9/2 when Bush gave a speech inside
the eye of the 'hurricane', becoming a Dorothy in a 'stargate'
twister... On 9/2 this year, Bush flew into the hurricane-stricken
Gulf-Coast areas for the first time, or in a sense, 'into the eye of
the hurricane'... 
Finally,
let me conclude this post with the following ominous set of data-points... New
Orleans sits near the mouth of the Mississippi River - which happens
to be the American 'Time River' in my theory that encodes the history
of the United States. 
It
was largely thanks to this that I was able to predict in 2000 - after
the Y2K non-event and before 9/11 - that we were about to see (before
2002) the
biggest event the US has ever experienced that might spell the end
for the nation. Back then this was a near-unthinkable scenario for
most. Not so after 9/11/01 and especially in 2005, now is it? I saw it
in the Mississippi timeline - the US timeline - which terminates
around the beginning of the 21st century. Or, in other words, the US
has essentially already ended with 9/11. It was the beginning
of the end at least. The
termination point is at latitude 28.93°N.
New Orleans is at 30°N which corresponds to the year ~1970 - when
mankind reached the Moon for the first time (Apollo 11, 1969).
The Moon again... 
The
event of a monster
hurricane/ Great Flood striking the mouth of the
Mississippi River sent a clear signal - at least to those
familiar with the hidden design underlying the biggest river of North
America. The United States is ending; a Great Flood is befalling the
corrupt Babylon that it has become. It is being terminated. The
Torch of Liberty is to be extinguished like Diana's life snuffed out in
a car crash. It's hard to interpret the sign in any other way - though
perhaps we could still view it as a warming... a serious
warning. 
I
have been very insistent on the importance of the 'Great Flood' theme
ever since Sumatra last December. But that was not really the
beginning. I had already propounded the theme in The
Time Rivers (2003) - expounded in Prologue and then repeated
in Epilogue. Here is from the former:
[...] The longer it takes
for the truth to come out, the more powerful and dangerous it
becomes. This is because by the time the truth is disclosed, there
would be a massive bubble produced upon the incomplete model of
reality which would be forced to burst by the new revelation. This
would be a destructive event especially if the neglected truth
directly affects the fundamental levels of the existing belief
system.
Truth or Flood
At this time in history, we have this precarious situation, and the
inevitable is fast approaching. The dam will not hold back water
much longer.
There is, however, still time to arrange a controlled release of
water to alleviate the pressure. Although it may cause some
disturbance, it is surely better than to block the rising water as
long as possible and pave the way for the inevitable, a
catastrophic ‘flood’. Sadly, human civilization today seems
to be moving toward the latter ending. And unless some
‘extraordinary’ breakthrough is introduced, the trend is likely
to continue.
In my view, this is what
'Judgment Day' is ultimately about. The more you disrespect truth,
the more you will be 'judged'... or the more you set yourself up for
a fall. It's only natural. Imbalance creates stress; stress becomes
a force that seeks to snap things back to a state of equilibrium;
and in that 'snap' is the 'Judgment Day' energy capable of
uncontrollable destruction.
So it all
comes back to how we need to align ourselves with 'Maàt', i.e. the
force of balance/truth, as much as we can in our physical existence
to minimize the distortion in the matrix and its inevitable
consequences. And that means consciously rebelling against our
genetically and socially programmed focus on
self-preservation/protection/promotion or the primitive 'survival of
the fittest' paradigm, either as an individual or as a race, which
is a biological condition that inevitably leads to the mind having
to adapt to the mostly sensory-based environment/context and having
to treat conventional assumptions as givens not open for further
examination.
The
more solid foundations you have (or think you have), the more
quickly you are able to come up with useful conclusions, which in
turn is an essential factor in the 'survival of the fittest' scheme.
(For example, when you see a fast car coming straight at you, you
don't have time to question if the car you see is real or perhaps
some kind of illusion. To survive, you'll need to make a quick
judgment, and to make that judgment your mind will have to have been
programmed to simply accept certain assumptions to speed up the
conclusion-making process.) But by doing this unquestioningly, you
incrementally start to mistake these assumptions for unbending
facts. The brain functions differently when something is accepted as
facts rather than theories or hypotheses. When you stop questioning,
you're inevitably creating imbalance/distortion in the matrix or the
fabric of reality itself which inherently favors the state of
equilibrium, Maàt.
The
multicontextual perspective exhibited on this website is a
way of circumventing the all-too-human trap - i.e. removing
assumptions and fixed contexts as much as possible. The only
'guides' in this 'reversed' thinking mode are 'coincidences' whose
causality is shrouded in the mystery of synchronicity. In a sense,
it's a 'future-based mode' of the mind where the 'why' and 'how'
questions are left unanswered until we reach 'Ground Zero', the
capstone of the pyramid, somewhere in the future at which point all
the different contexts stitched together by symbolic and
synchronistic connections get truly unified and give birth to a
universal context capable of illuminating the causality of many
things that had been hidden beneath the threshold of awareness. In a
normal thinking mode, which is 'past-based' (empirical), one would
first look for any sign of tangible/linear causality (which means searching
for a comparable experience in the memory bank) upon which a simple,
linearly-extended future
projection can be based. If you hear a loud thunder and then see
rain coming down 5 minutes later (you get wet and feel miserable), the next time you hear a thunder
your mind will likely remember the negative experience and let you
theorize that you're going to see rain soon and you'll start looking
for a shelter. A
monkey or even a mouse can behave like that. A freaking robot can be
programmed to do that. It requires very little intelligence. A
mindset driven by the duality of physiological pleasure and pain is Neanderthal
stuff. Again, machines can mimic this behavior.
School
treats people like machines but that doesn't mean we have to give up
the potential we have for higher intelligence - a future-based
perspective. And 'future' is but a quantum sea of possibilities not
yet actualized. A realm in superposition - quantum waves not yet
collapsed. These days we often hear the phrase 'failure of
imagination' but we still tend to look at imagination as something
extra or additional and not something of critical importance.
Imagination, the future, the matrix of unactualized possibilities, IS
the hidden part of who we are and thus the ultimate Grail. The
'stargate' is in the present, through which we can move beyond the
threshold - protected by the 'Sphinx' - into 'the other side' that
is the future where 'time is reversed' and called the 'Golden Age'.
The 'great battle' is then between the past and the future,
expressed biologically in us in the form of a left-right brain
dichotomy.
To
lessen the impact of 'Judgment Day', therefore, we need to
embrace possibilities - i.e. we need to become creative.
Creativity is the essential ingredient of the
'stargate'. Creativity is about actively seeking and actualizing
possibilities; the more possibilities taken into account, the truer
the resultant conclusion. The truer a thing is, the less distortion
in the matrix it creates. The less distortion there is in the
matrix, the less impact 'Judgment Day' will have. Anything that does
not encourage harnessing creativity - like organized religions
demanding no deviations from the authorized way of thinking
regardless of the soundness of logic involved - contributes to the
corruption of the world and the intensification of the eventual
'Judgment Day' event. A stargate corrupted - a la the scripturally
perceived 'Babylon' - is a tower that the lightening strikes.
Becoming
creative alone won't get the job done, however. We need to be able
to navigate in the sea of possibilities to get to anywhere
meaningful. (Without this, one might easily 'lose it'
psychologically.) And the ladder to be used for this is logic.
How to combine the two is the critical stage in opening the
'stargate'. We insert any amount of that past-driven and/or
self-interest 'ego' and the whole process is contaminated and
'quarantined'; it is prevented from going anywhere beyond the
threshold.
Coherence
and universality would be the key gauge to be used here. Getting
stuck in a context is the last thing we want to do because it is a
sure way to make our mind start filtering out possibilities. In a
primitive thinking mode, context rules. In a mode of higher
intelligence, possibilities rule over context. This is not to say
that context is unimportant, but that it has such a big impact on
how the mind interacts with possibilities/future that we need to be
VERY careful about the soundness of any given context. You settle on
a context and your fate is dependent on its validity/universality.
If the context is faulty, you're going down with it sooner or later.
So, yes, context is a powerful tool, therefore, like 'fire',
it needs to be treated with as much as care as you can muster.
To
want an answer is not the same as to want the truth...
Okay,
that's enough babbling for now... :)
Permalink
| STRUG
|
.
Another
'cute' hint (if we can call it that...) in this regard was the 
the midpoint between the equinox and the solstice (in this case ~8/7).
I also pointed out that the same date (+/-1) is highlighted by the
Champs-Elysees, or 'the Historical Axis of Paris', which is designed
to align with the sunset on August 6-8. We might then call it...
'French cross-quarter'.
