first, National Security Adviser Condi Rice's testimony before the
9/11 Commission last Thursday turned out to be quite a big
deal just as anticipated. Here is an excerpt from my 4/6 update
(two days before Condi's testimony):
...we are anxiously
waiting to see if Condi will expose the reason why the White House
didn't want her to testify. ...Condi may be forced to reveal things
that'll put Team Bush in a deep hole from which there will be no
escape. [...] Will Condi expose something
momentous...? The symbolism suggests that the potential is
there. ...[S]he is certainly in
a position to be able to deliberately or accidentally expose big
In addition to common sense,
this anticipation had largely derived from certain symbolism I had
observed. It had to do with a curious parallel seemingly existing
between Janet Jackson - already interpreted to signify the 'Black
Madonna'/Mary Magdalene - and Condi Rice. I wrote previously on Apr.
the 'Black Madonna' exposing her breast also seems to have
foreshadowed the next big political event in the US, i.e.
National Security Adviser Condi Rice's public
testimony... Will Condi expose something momentous just as
Janet exposed her breast...?
I'm sure some/many readers felt
making this parallel was bit of a stretch, but just two days after
Rice's testimony we were given an in-your-face 'acknowledgment' of
this idea. On NBC's popular Saturday Night Live program (Apr
Janet Jackson - who happened to be guest-hosting it - was shown
playing the role of none other than Condi in the opening
skit which comically reenacted the 9/11 hearing! Not only that, at
the end of the skit Janet self-mockingly flashed her right breast
(blurred on TV) before the 9/11 Commission members!
The point here is not that
Janet, the comedians, or the writers were consciously aware of the
symbolism involved (they most likely weren't). There was perhaps some
kind of conscious effort at some level to push this parallel theme,
but the point is that the amazing 'coincidence' did happen regardless
of what led to it behind the scenes. Obviously, it was as if the
skit was based on what I happened to write in the 4/6 post, and this
raises our confidence level that we're tracking a valid 'pattern'.
Previously we compared Janet's
infamous 'Super Bowl flash' to what Condi might reveal in her 9/11
testimony - the implication being that the National Security Adviser
was likely to drop a 'bomb' that would have a big political impact,
something that would 'put Team Bush in a deep(er) hole from which there will be no
escape'. Well, I don't have to point out that this is indeed pretty
much what took place as a result of Condi's 9/11 testimony.
I'm of course talking about
(Presidential Daily Brief) from August 6, 2001 (one month before
9/11). First, Condi was pressured into revealing the nature and title
of the PDB memo during her testimony (made public for the first time).
The bluntness of the title of the pre-9/11 memo shocked many people: 'Bin
Laden Determined to Strike in US'. Basically:
Two and a half
years after 9/11, the American public learned... that President Bush
received explicit warnings that Osama bin Laden was planning to
attack the United States – including activities "consistent
with preparations for hijacking." Yet, there was no domestic
follow-up by the Bush administration. No high level meetings. No
sense of urgency. No warnings to FBI agents across the country.
This was 'the bomb' (one in a
series, past and future) that has greatly intensified the political
firestorm now surrounding the White House. Now it has finally become
more or less 'official' that the White House 'knew
and did nothing'. This is now an inescapable perception. And I have
observed that the 'allowed to happen' theory of 9/11 generally
considered too conspiratorial is currently receiving increasing
attention in the more mainstream circles.
Given the seriousness of the
implications, the 9/11 panel and the
the White House to declassify
the PDB. And, seeing that they were cornered, they did release
two days later on Saturday - the same day as the airing of the Saturday
Night Live show guest-hosted by Janet Jackson.
And while the White House
appears to be in deep denial over this, the memo clearly shows that
the Bush administration was warned about bin Ladin/al-Qaeda's
intention to attack inside the US. This was not a mere 'historical'
document as Rice insisted during the 9/11 hearing; it was a warning
about a plausible al-Qaeda attack - and you can tell that simply from
looking at the PDB title. There is no spinning this away. The White
House now finds itself hopelessly trapped - especially since more
revelations and troubles are coming.
Another reason why I view the
Aug. 6 PDB as important has to do with the attached date. As long-time
Etemenanki readers should quickly recall, 'August 6' is the
Sirius-Paris-Antichrist day. It is the date of the star Sirius'
heliacal rising as seen from Giza/Cairo; and the astronomical
alignment of the Champs-Elysees, the 'Historical Axis of Paris',
involving Sirius and the Sun, also pinpoints the same date Aug. 6.
Both Sirius and Paris ('Par-Isis') are closely associated with the
goddess Isis, who is traditionally speaking the ancient Egyptian
equivalent of Mary Magdalene, i.e. the 'Black Madonna' (=
August 6 is also the date of the
nuking of Hiroshima and the date of Schwarzenegger dramatically
announcing his decision to run for governor of California last year.
Indeed, one of the big reasons why we've been closely following Arnie
on this website since
Aug. 6 last year and theorizing
that he is an 'antichristic figure' is because of the prominent
involvement of this very ominous date.
At any rate, let me also say
that since I have long applied our 'Babylon leader falling' theme to
the Bush White House (since 2002), I'm not at all surprised to see the
sudden sinking of the US leadership this year. And all this is indeed much
more serious than Watergate. This White House has so many deplorable
wrongdoings under its belt that it was really just a matter of timing.
It survived this long because it had the support of the very
high-level elite apparatus which wanted to see the neocons' imperial
PNAC/Pax Americana plan realized - because, for instance, the dire
Peak Oil situation is now arriving. But because there were no WMDs
found in Iraq to the dismay of the clueless neoconservative ideologues
like Wolfowitz, Perle, Libby, Feith, etc. their master plan simply
collapsed. By the fall of 2003, just months after the Iraq invasion,
it was clear that the neocon Pax Americana ambition had no real hope
of going forward beyond Iraq (eg. Syria, Iran, etc.).
The US military forces were
simply stuck in Iraq. It's such a mess over there at this time because
there was no planning for this kind of situation. The neocon cabal,
including Cheney and Rumsfeld, had no intention of idly sitting in
Iraq after invasion - the PNAC-based plan was obviously to move on to
the next 'rogue nations' like Iran and Syria. The 'preemptive' US
aggression was not really about protecting America; it was much more
about oil and helping Israel. This should be common knowledge by now.
And it is my view that the elite
support for the Bush administration was withdrawn by last November.
The strange timing of the Saddam capture last December may be linked
to this shift. The White House surely would have liked to come up with
the big capture much later, closer to Election Day as it would have
had much more direct impact on Bush's chances of being reelected. The
fact that they weren't able to delay the Saddam capture - which could
have easily be done - into the election year seems to suggest the Bush
administration had already lost the elite support.
And without the strong,
fascism-like support system (including the media), the ship of the
White House just has too many holes to keep it from sinking. This is
what we are witnessing today. The way I see it, the powerful force of
the 'New World Order' that had previously been helping them is now
working against them - probably because the Bush administration
is no longer 'useful'. Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry,
another member of the Yale secret society Skull and Bones (Bush is
also a Bonesman), would apparently be a more useful puppet leader to them.
Of course, there is also the
chance that the dark element inside the Bush administration may, like
a cornered animal, decide to do something drastic (eg. 'another 9/11',
'capturing' Osama, nuclear detonation, etc.) to stay afloat. Create a
crisis, declare martial law, and cancel the election. That's certainly
a quite plausible scenario, and perhaps this is something the higher
NWO crowd would not mind. They may just want to see the Cheney crowd
either go down or go crazy...
In any case, the fact is that
the White House is now in deep trouble and their situation is likely
to worsen unless interrupted via the above scenario. I mean, we're
talking indictments, resignations, or even jail time here. I'm very
interested to see how long people like Karl Rove, Condi, and
especially Cheney will stay afloat in the White House. 9/11 negligence
and Iraq intelligence manipulation are serious issues threatening Team
Bush but I'd have to say keep your eye on the development of 'Treasongate',
i.e. the White House outing of a CIA spy last summer. Its ongoing
investigation should produce some quite serious results in the near
Even Condi Rice's testimony
before the 9/11 Commission was rather troublesome in terms of
legality. It was done under oath and yet Condi made many false
claims - i.e. lies. As Michael Ruppert put
gentlemen, what you witnessed today, on every major network, was
perjury - a felony... The revolution may not be televised. But it
may have begun as a result of what was televised today.
So, again, the 'Black Madonna'
Condi's appearance before the Commission was a big event that exposed
- or at least began to expose - the dark side of the White House in a
very public way, just as Janet Jackson exposed her breast and caused a
big controversy. The projected pattern was realized.
Following the same
symbolic pattern, I'm now looking at the potential significance of
Attorney General John Ashcroft's testimony before the 9/11 Commission
coming this Tuesday (4/13, 3:30pm EDT). Given the symbolic connection
already found between Janet's Super Bowl stunt and Ashcroft (and his
Patriot Act mentality) explained
in my Feb. 3 update, we are encouraged to look forward to further
high-impact revelations coming through or relating to Ashcroft. Should
be interesting to watch all this development.