to the Etemenanki website by Goro Adachi
Welcome to the
Etemenanki website (www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/)
Archive: 2003 (Apr-July)
The View from
|July 28, '03 Parasite
the middle of March, 2003, tbrnews received an email from a man who
claimed to be a mid-level executive with a major American television
network. He stated in this, and subsequent, emails that he was in
possession of “thousands” of pages of in-house memos sent from
his corporate headquarters in New York City to the head of the
network’s television news department. He went on to say that these
memos set forth directives about what material was, and was not, to
be aired on the various outlets of the network.
individual claimed he was developing serious doubts about the strict
control of media events and decided that he would pass this material
along to someone who might make use of it [i.e. TBRnews]...
Sounds intriguing, doesn't it?
And it actually appears as if the memos could be
genuine. And disturbing is the nature of the directives found in
these memos. Here are a couple of example (underlines in original):
26) Shots of GIs must show a
mixed racial combination….any interviews must reflect the youthful
and idealistic, not the cynical point of view…the liberation of
happy, enthusiastic Iraqis can be best shown by filming crowds of
cheering citizens waving American flags. …of course, pictures
of dead US military personnel are not to be shown and
pictures of dead Iraqi soldiers should not show examples of violent
10) ...pro-Government rallies are to be given the fullest
coverage…if anti-Government demonstrations are shown, it is
desired to stress either a very small number of “eccentrics” or
shots of social misfits…
Even if these memos are not genuine, they still accurately
reflects what we've been
seeing on American TV (especially on 'Faux News').
It is interesting to detect in more
recent memos some nervousness as they hint at the potential fall
of the Bush administration and discuss how to keep some distance from it (a
parasite leaving its host, so to speak). And it's worth noting that they
contain ominous info concerning what may potentially happen in the
near future. Here are excerpts (underlines in original):
12) ...If Bush has
the same problems Nixon did over Watergate, we cannot be seen by our
viewers as being blindly partisan. We have to have
plausible deniability in this.
(July 14) ...There is a growing
fear in counter intelligence circles that if the resistance movement
in Iraq is not stopped, the resulting very bad PR might cause an
“incident” somewhere in the US just before election time to whip
the voters up to vote for Bush as a “wartime leader”... Someone in
the FBI said to one of our people, entirely off the record, that quote
it will probably be the Statue of Liberty endquote. There must be
no speculation on this subject under any circumstances. If some rigged
incident does happen and we comment on it in advance, new regulations
could cause us serious problems …If this happens, it will be
Rumsfeld who plans and executes it. This will give the President the
usual deniability. It is more than likely that we will get some
advance notice of such an action and then decisions can be made
relative to going to the public.
Again, my feeling is that even if
these memos are not 100% genuine, they
likely reflect what is going on behind the scenes rather well. And
that's a pretty disturbing thought.
On another subject, I'm planning
a 'major presentation' later this week which has to do with a totally
different but very important matter. I won't say what it is; just be
prepared to be catapulted into another dimension! :)
In the mean time, here is a
quote and some good links:
"To announce that there
must be no criticism of the president, right or wrong, is not only
unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
public." - Theodore Roosevelt
Commander in Chief Is Losing the War of the 16 Words
intelligence role scrutinized
Section of Sept. 11 Report Faults Saudi Rulers
Amazing Stories of Condoleezza Rice
|July 23, '03 Drip,
'stargate window' approaches, things continue to move in the expected
direction. (See Endgame
But the big
news yesterday was the killing of Saddam's
sons Oday and Qusay. A rare positive development for the Bush regime.
And of course the White House just 'happened' to choose this
opportunity - when public attention was focused elsewhere - to
disclose very embarrassing information: that a high-ranking White
House official was repeatedly warned by the CIA Director (the
previous 'fall guy') about the dubious nature of the evidence for Iraq
seeking uranium. As reported:
[Stephen] Hadley, [top aide to
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice,] in a rare on-the-record
session with reporters, said that he had received two memos from the
CIA and a phone call from agency Director George Tenet last October
raising objections to an allegation that Iraq was seeking to buy
uranium ore from Africa to use in building nuclear weapons.
And Hadley claims it just
'slipped from his attention as the State of the Union was being put
together'. Yeah, I hate when that happens. But hey, it's only about
nuclear weapons - who cares, right?!
And then Hadley
said 'my bad; should I resign?', and Bush responded 'oh that's okay,
you're doing a great job; please stay'. Who do they think they are
fooling with this pathetic charade?
Do they really think we are too
stupid to know that the scandal can be traced back to Vice President
Cheney and his neo-con minions lurking in and around the
administration? (Bush himself is probably just a 'useful idiot' in
this, though he should also be held responsible.) It's just a matter
of time, though. Drip, drip, drip... The dam will collapse.
Look at the British counterpart
and we get a hint of what's in store. Prime Minister Tony Blair is
quickly approaching his end - especially with the very suspicious
recent death of Iraq weapons expert David Kelly, who leaked
information damaging to Blair. It's getting very messy over there.
Blair should have known that aligning with the out-of-control Bush
regime would be a political suicide.
Here are some good links with
in the Water: Watergate II
Prosecutor's Investigation Needed for the WMDs Mess
it was Clinton, now Bush faces impeachment
Committee Wanted Iraq/Uranium Ref In Pres Speech
16 Questions For Bush
Report Said Defeated Hussein Would Be Threat
does 9/11 inquiry scare Bush?
You're Not Paranoid, You're Not Paying Attention
|July 11, '03 Attack
of Sept 11
yesterday, CBS News posted a hard-hitting article provocatively titled 'Bush
Knew Iraq Info Was False' [Note: CBS now
changed 'False' to 'Dubious' in the title, which is actually more
When President Bush told the
nation, incorrectly, that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from Africa,
he did so despite being warned by the CIA that it wasn't true, CBS
News has learned exclusively.
This apparently marks the
beginning of the major US media networks' long-overdue attack on the Bush
administration. It represents a big step in the quickening
progress toward the projected 'fall' (see Endgame
V). It does seem the 'board of directors' behind the scenes
are no longer willing or able to protect the Bush administration as it
had been since 9/11. Interestingly, today is a 'Sept 11' - since sept
means 'seven' (September was originally the seventh month). I can
almost see Zeus' thunderbolt striking the chariot of the sun...
I'd say the scandal is no longer
smoldering; it's about to become a big fire storm, and right on
schedule so far. What goes up must come down; and Bush went way up
there. This one is going to be very messy. (What will Karl Rove do
now? He may well try something drastic to try to save the sinking
Titanic... This is a critical time and should be
interesting/disturbing to watch.)
|July 10, '03
working on (or at least thinking hard about) a number of projects at
this time. One is a follow-up to Endgame
V specifically concerning the ~June 24 'preview window'. Right
now I'm not sure whether I want to make it into 'Endgame VI' or just
an addendum to Endgame V. I'm also in the early phase
of getting ready to do The Adachi Report #2. It's been many
months since I published the first one and I think I now have the kind of
material suited for the Report, which is a little 'blacker'
(i.e. closer to my 'black project').
Another work in progress, particular
important in my view, is the activation of the 'Time Rivers' section
of my website, which will technically be outside of Etemenanki.
It will obviously deal with the Time River theory presented in my book.
I just feel
it is time to begin 'leaking' the information to the web. (By
the way, if you have already read the book, I'd love to hear your
comments - email me your
I'm also thinking about
Sessions. But the problem here is that I'm not sure I can motivate
'X' to do any more sessions. It could be that I'll just have to find
another 'X'. So if anyone out there wants to try it, let me know.
In the mean time, here are some links
worth checking out - if nothing else then to stimulate our mind often
confused and sedated by the pathetic US mainstream media:
Bush - Part I
is happening in America?
Bush Mislead US Into War?
Attack Has Been Spectacular
report on 9/11 to be 'explosive'
'The Wrong Man?'
- The Carlyle Group
considered Bush useless
Than Watergate! (rigged election)
|June 29, '03 A
'Chariot of the Sun' Crashes
been getting emails from observant readers (thanks Tim and 'Rock')
that there was a unique plane crash
last Thursday (June 26) that strongly reflected a key theme attached
to our 'preview' window (around June 24) discussed in Endgame
This was a $15 million, remotely
piloted, and solar-powered "one of a kind" aerial vehicle
being tested by NASA, called Helios.
In Endgame V, we discussed how the potential fall of Bush would
parallel the mythical story about the 'son of the sun/Helios' called Phaëthon
who lost control of the 'chariot of the sun' and fell into Eridanus,
the 'Ocean Stream', which became his grave (analogous to the 'tomb of
Osiris'). Well, NASA's 'Helios' - which is obviously a 'solar vehicle'
in that it was solar- powered and the name 'Helios' denotes the sun -
could easily be viewed as a 'chariot of the sun' that crashed...
into the Pacific Ocean.
What's more, the Helios plane
had set an altitude record two years ago on August 13, '01 - as
if to allude to the 2-year cycle pattern that is inseparable from the
upcoming 'stargate window' this summer/fall (i.e. what is theoretically
being foreshadowed by this 'preview event'). I'd say the symbolism is quite
Another interesting event
observed on the same day as the Helios crash was the death
of Strom Thurmond, former senator, at the age of 100. What's
interesting about this is that Thurmond was a key figure in one of the
events of the 'December window' last year. The fall of senate majority
leader Trent Lott, which represented a downgraded version of the
'Babylon leader falling' theme attached to the window (as well as the
'stargate window'), was a direct result of Lott praising Thurmond's
segregationist past. So, there seems to be a curious and ominous echo
There is actually much more to the 'preview' window, which I
will discuss later on. This was just a little update.
|June 27, '03 Foreshadowing
the period around June 24 was suggested in Endgame V as a
'preview window' that might in some way foreshadow the nature of the upcoming 'stargate window'.
On an exoteric level, June 24 turned out to be the bloodiest day for
coalition forces since the 'end' of the war in Iraq as six British
soldiers were killed
(and more injured). But was this significant? Perhaps - only to the
extent that it may have hinted at a coming 'disaster' in Iraq this
But I am actually more
interested in what's happening with SOHO
at this time. And somehow... Roswell, where a 'UFO' supposedly crashed
in 1947 (around July 4). More later...
|June 22, '03 Endgame
V: On the Chariot of the Sun
took a little longer than expected, but Endgame V: 'On the Chariot of
the Sun' has arrived. This is dark and somewhat
complicated stuff but... Well, let me know
what you think of it.
|June 9, '03
As we entered the month of June,
there is suddenly a growing rumbling of a major scandal in the
air. And this all stems from the simple question: 'Where the hell
are the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction?'
In a recent news article,
for example, it was written:
When all three major US
newsweeklies - Time, Newsweek and US News & World Report - run
major features on the same day on possible government lying, you can
bet you have the makings of a major scandal. [...]
"This is potentially very
serious," said one Congressional aide. "If it's shown we
went to war because of intelligence that was 'cooked' by the
administration, heads will have to roll, and not just little heads,
John W. Dean, a law expert, similarly writes in his column 'Is
Lying About The Reason For War An Impeachable Offense?':
In the three decades since
Watergate, this is the first potential scandal I have seen that could
make Watergate pale by comparison. If the Bush Administration
intentionally manipulated or misrepresented intelligence to get
Congress to authorize, and the public to support, military action to
take control of Iraq, then that would be a monstrous misdeed. [...]
[T]his Administration may
be due for a scandal. While Bush narrowly escaped being dragged into
Enron, it was not, in any event, his doing. But the war in Iraq is all
Bush's doing, and it is appropriate that he be held accountable.
To put it bluntly, if Bush has
taken Congress and the nation into war based on bogus information, he
Here is another article (Ex-Official:
Evidence Distorted for War):
The Bush administration
distorted intelligence and presented conjecture as evidence to justify
a U.S. invasion of Iraq, according to a retired intelligence official who served
during the months before the war.
"What disturbs me deeply is
what I think are the disingenuous statements made from the very top
about what the intelligence did say," said Greg Thielmann, who
retired last September. "The area of distortion was greatest in
the nuclear field."
Unless they find some WMDs in
Iraq, then, the current situation is just a tame prelude to what's likely to develop in
the coming months.
While this was something I was
saving for my next article, Endgame V, I guess this is a good
place to mention that the fall of Bush - a 'Babylon leader' along with
Saddam, the Pope, etc. - is one of the likely scenarios
projected to manifest in, or in association with the 'stargate window'
this coming summer/fall (discussed in the Endgame IV
article). And I have been dropping hints about this potential
development since before the Iraq war. (Actually, as early as December
2000 - during the US presidential election fiasco - I was saying
that 'the next president
[i.e. Bush] may not last
long' or that '[the next] presidents will in some way mark the
end of presidency or the United States as it exists today.)
In any case, it would be
interesting to see what the Bush team will do to try to counteract the
tide now turning against them. Karl Rove and all the neo-conservatives
surrounding Bush are a ruthless bunch, so it's difficult to imagine
them just sitting quietly and letting it gain momentum. The
most effective way to stop the growing criticism is to
find WMDs in Iraq. But even they must be realizing at this time that
there may be no WMDs to be found there. So the question is: Will they plant
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to justify their position?
This is a legitimate question
since, as more and more people are coming to realize, the Bush
administration doesn't hesitate to use deception to get what they
deemed likely to succeed, they probably won't think twice about making
fake discovery of Iraqi WMDs to silence their critics.
It is useful to
know that according to the philosophy of Leo Strauss, who influenced
many neo-cons, it is necessary for the elite rulers to create perpetual war
and deception to control the populace. And if needed, it tells us, it
is perfectly okay to manufacture an external threat to achieve the
perpetual state of war. So, why would the neo-cons - if they really
are devoted followers of Strauss - hesitate to plant some WMDs in
The only thing stopping them
from implementing the deception may be the quite widespread
anticipation of just such an action in the minds of the still-thinking
segment of the general public. But with the mounting pressure pushing
Team Bush into a corner at this time, they just might go ahead with
it soon. And they should know that the clock is ticking because it
appears there is only a small, one or two-month window to pull it off.
The key here is that there is a
crucial difference between the issue of the existence of Iraqi WMDs
and the issue of Team Bush lying
about the danger posed by Iraq in justifying the war. If it turns out
that - as it is likely - the Bush administration manipulated
intelligence data to support their case for war, then the matter of
whether or not there was any WMD in Iraq becomes more or less
irrelevant. Lying to the American people in order to drag the nation
into a war is unconstitutional. It is a high crime. If it can be
proven that the administration was dishonest in how they presented the
information for the war, then it doesn't matter Iraq really had WMDs
or cooperated with al Qaeda. The initial deception itself should be
enough for some serious head rolling.
So for Team Bush it is not
enough to find/plant WMDs; they need to do it before congressional
investigations make it clear to the general public that the
administration committed a crime. It would be vital for them to
mislead people into thinking that the discovery of Iraqi WMDs makes
everything okay (i.e. 'the end justifies the means'). Assuming that
investigations will begin this summer, the Bush administration has
only few months to successfully pull off this potential deception.
(But if they do decide to manufacture evidence, I'd say there is a
strong possibility that it too will be shown to be what it truly is,
and dramatically worsen the situation.)
Of course, there is another
probable scenario that would help counter the turning pendulum:
another '9/11'. Renewed chaos and fear should work very well for them
just about now. And this
would again tie in with the 'stargate window' around Sept. '03, which
is projected to be the 'echo window' of 9/11.
As I wrote in the pre-war Feb.
18 update here: "I was not particularly
concerned about [the] short-term development [of the US-Iraq
conflict]. I'm more interested in
seeing how the situation could develop into a 'climax' during the 'stargate
In my view, the 'storm' is
coming one way or
|May 31, '03 Where
is the Outrage?
very curious that key member of Team Bush, such as Rumsfeld and
Wolfowitz, are now openly admitting that the threat of Iraqi WMD was
not the true reason for preemptively attacking the weak middle eastern
nation (where the people did not ask for such outside intervention).
European critics of the Iraq
war expressed shock Friday at published remarks by a senior U.S.
official playing down Iraq's weapons of mass destruction as the
reason for the conflict. [...]
In an interview in the next
issue of Vanity Fair magazine, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
Wolfowitz cited "bureaucratic reasons" for focusing on
Saddam Hussein's alleged arsenal [...] "For
bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass
destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree
on," Wolfowitz was quoted as saying. [source]
Of course, those of us still
capable of seeing through all the mainstream media-assisted propaganda
BS already knew this from the beginning. But now the neo-conservatives
surrounding Bush led by Wolfowitz, who had been obsessed with toppling
Saddam and getting Iraq's oil long before 9/11, have the audacity to
publicly admit that they lied to the American people and the
rest of the world to get what they wanted - a key step toward
achieving their ultimate goal of creating a global 'Pax Americana'
We should be outraged and
demanding the removal of those who knowingly created and endorsed the
It should be realized that many
of the Bush administration's actions come straight out of the Nazi
"If you tell a lie big enough and
keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."
"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can
shield the people from the political, economic and/or military
consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the
State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is
the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the
greatest enemy of the State." —Joseph Goebbels, German Minister of Propaganda, 1933-1945
Is this comparison unreasonable?
Well, consider this: US
Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
Wolfowitz is a disciple of Leo Strauss (1899-1973), a Zionist-fascist
philosopher, who in turn was directly influenced/mentored by Martin
Heidegger, the leading ideologue of the Third Reich, and Carl Schmitt,
the Nazi legal architect. The philosophical/political views of the
neo-conservatives now in power in the Bush administration, in other
words, can be traced straight back to the Nazi regime.
No wonder there is fascism in
the darkening air these days, eh? How much longer will we allow this
deadly cancer to spread? How much longer will we, by remaining silent,
continue to empower the closet fascists aligned with pure greed that
is corporate America? The American people have the right to remain silent,
but those brave ones whose allegiance is to the spirit of truth,
justice, and freedom - i.e. what America should stand for - know it's time
to exercise their freedom to speak out against the corrupt authority.
|May 19, '03
Endgame IV: Stargate 2003
here it is - Endgame
IV: Stargate 2003, which will take the 'Endgame' discussion to
a whole new level.
Prepare yourself before delving
into this one as it is big... both in size and impact.
I'm pretty tired from writing
it, so I'll go rest... :)
|May 1, '03
'The Time Rivers' - now available!
am happy to announce that my book, The
Time Rivers, is finally here! Please follow the link to read
more about it and/or purchase.
It is my ultimate challenge to
'reality', and reality hasn't been challenged like this before, I
don't think. :) Hopefully this will trigger the opening of the
The secret is finally out.
|April 11, '03 In
the Name of Peace
seems that Baghdad has fallen and the Saddam regime is nowhere to be
seen. We are told that the Iraqi people
have been 'liberated'. 'The game', as the Iraqi
ambassador to the US said, 'is over'.
Actually, it's only the beginning...
of the 'Endgame'.
It is true that many Iraqis are genuinely
pleased that the tyrant is no longer on the throne in Baghdad - but that's not
really the key issue.
What is insidiously important is the real agenda of the US, or more
accurately the Bush administration.
Did the US invade Iraq to
liberate its people? Wasn't the original goal supposedly to disarm Saddam, who the
Bush administration strongly suspected had weapons of mass destruction? Weren't we told that it was
necessary to invade Iraq immediately because its leader was a crazy tyrant who would not
hesitate to use WMD against the US and others?
Well, so where are those
and why hasn't Saddam used any of them against the invading enemy? For
a tyrant who supposedly rivals Hitler, he sure hasn't been aggressive
at all in this war. (Of course, at this point the Bush regime is
acting as if the liberation of the Iraqi people was the reason for the
invasion.) This awkward situation suggests that: A) Iraq does not have WMD,
B) Saddam has them but is humane enough to not use them even if that
means his reign coming to an end, C) Saddam is already dead, D) Saddam
made a secret deal with the US, or E)
Saddam has a plan to use them in an unexpected way later in the war.
I can think of some more
possibilities, but in any case the easy 'victory' so far for the US is not necessarily
good news for the invading force. Whatever the immediate outcome, by
pre-emptively attacking Iraq the US has opened a Pandora's Box.
America is no
longer a role model that it used to be for many nations around the
world; it is now an unruly 'cop' that does what it pleases. America no
longer leads by example, it now rules by force... and it is addicted
The United States has been reduced to a
bully that everybody continues to follow but actually despises.
Sadly, it is quite clear that the Bush administration is driven by hidden
agendas on many levels. One has to do with world domination - a 'Pax
Americana' or 'American peace' - envisioned by the Project for the New
American Century (PNAC). It's a plan drawn up by neo-conservatives for people
like Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy),
Jeb Bush, and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff).
For all intents and purposes, the US is trying to
become a global 'empire'. And by crushing the Iraq regime, it is kick-starting
this ambitious, and frankly arrogant, process. You might want to
follow the links provided below and read about the ugliness that
exists just beneath the surface.
planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President
redefined means securing cheap energy
think tank war: Why old Europe says no
president's real goal in Iraq
West's battle for oil
Babylon. The Tigris and Euphrates
9/11 was not the root cause
of all the recent US aggression; 9/11 was instead a big opportunity.
The dream of a Pax Americana was
already in existence before 9/11. In fact, the terrorist attacks were so beneficial to the hidden
plan that we can't help but wonder if 9/11 was... well, let's not
go there at this time.
Indeed, as far as those arrogant
dreamers behind the plan are concerned, the reign of Bush must be a golden window of opportunity. An intellectually disabled leader
- friendly to
them/corporate America - is installed in the White House, leading a
powerful but increasingly mindless
nation, which is manipulated into
supporting the leader who has no clothes. All the checks and
balances are now pretty much gone; the media is turning
into a corporate puppet; patriotism is used as a weapon against freedom
and individual rights; democracy
is under attack; the nation doesn't realize it's being raped and
it's actually screaming for more... This is a depressing and very
The point is, 'they' can pretty
much do whatever they want during this 'Perfect Storm'. Very little
resistance now, and no responsibility later (Bush is the shield for
that)... They are enjoying raping Lady Liberty here in the US still
reeling from 9/11, and elsewhere creating fictitious wars for oil and
domination... During this Storm, they can get away with almost
The ironic thing is, it's all done
in the name of 'peace'. Indeed, 'peace' is the key underlying theme
for today's world events.
In a sense, it may be that the
current situation is being facilitated by an unseen 'force' with a wider
perspective which is allowing the destabilization to take place so that the 'trouble makers'
planet would kill each other off or self-destruct -- thus paving the
way for a new beginning for humanity. It's a 'Project Phoenix' (AKA
Who are the 'trouble makers'?
Well, this is where we come back to the 'Babylon falling' theme
discussed in my recent articles. The 'Project Phoenix' seems to be
about striking down Babylon, the Tower of Babel, as dramatically
signaled by the destruction of the WTC towers.
'Babylon' is the gateway between
heaven and earth; but it is also the corrupt authority that has
between man and 'God'. The latter manifestation of 'Babylon', as I
have discussed before, is represented by the US, Iraq, and the Church
(Israel and Mars could join the list also). In terms of religion,
'Babylon' is Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. And we have Washington
DC/NYC, Baghdad, Rome, and Jerusalem as prominent 'Babylon cities',
i.e. cities of corruption.
The cities of corruption,
ironically, are also 'cities of peace'.
Baghdad, the modern incarnation
of the ancient city Babylon that sat slightly to the southwest, was
originally called Madinat as-Salam, 'City of Peace'. Washington DC is
'District of Columbia', which denotes 'District of
Peace' as Columbia derives from 'Columba', Noah's Dove; the dove
is a universal symbol of peace. (So the US itself, i.e.
Columbia, is a 'nation of peace'.) Jerusalem, the eye of the religious
storm, has a name denoting 'city of peace' (or 'foundation of peace').
And Rome (Roma), the center of Catholicism, is Amor - meaning 'love' -
spelled in reverse.
While 'love' is not quite
'peace', it's interesting to note that the term 'Catholic' means
'universal', which would then be relatable to the decommissioned
Russian space station, Mir - as the name means 'world' (i.e.
'universe'). It happens that 'Mir' can also mean 'peace'.
What's more, the name 'Islam' is
often said to mean 'peace', and the hidden plan currently driving the
US aggression is the vision of a 'Pax Americana', i.e. 'American peace'.
The unfortunate implication is
that 'peace' in the emerging context seems to mean just the opposite -
war. It's all reversed. And so like Mir and the
shuttle Columbia, 'peace' is falling to its demise.
The fiery fall of Mir -
'world/peace' - in March 2001 was closely followed by 9/11, which I
think most of us would agree was an unmistakable trigger for the end of
'world peace' (and of course of the 'World' Trade Center towers).
The Columbia disaster on Feb. 1 this year - a 'peace disaster'
- was immediately followed by the controversial Iraq war that is
further threatening world peace. And as if
these weren't enough, it was announced just yesterday that British
Airways and Air France has decided to permanently ground
Concorde - starting this summer. 'Concorde' means 'peace'. Ominous?
Another remarkable 'sign' was
Project Prometheus announced in January this year - a NASA project
(nuclear propulsion system) hoped to lead to sending man to Mars. I
have already discussed the significance of the 'Prometheus' symbolism
in my previous updates, but what I haven't mentioned is the fat that Prometheus,
the mythological giver of fire, can be represented (via 'pramantha')
by the swastika. This ancient symbol traditionally signifies none other than peace! And following
our 'reversal' theme,
let's turn the symbol around - which gives us the 'sinistroverse'
swastika used by the Nazis, synonymous with, not peace, but
Nazis, of course, are a major theme discussed in my articles Endgame
II and 1999:
Final Solution. Particularly in the former, I discussed
how the Nazis' technological legacy is very pertinent to the present
time. In connection with the puzzling message decoded from an 'alien glyph' that
appeared in England last year, I discussed how the 'false gift'
mentioned in the apparent warning relates to the Nazis' ultra-secret
'stargate' technology that was likely smuggled into the US after the
war. Fittingly enough, Prometheus is popularly known for giving the gift
of fire to man.
consider this: the goal of Project Prometheus is to develop a nuclear
propulsion system for interplanetary travel; the announcement of the
project coincided with the US accusing Iraq of hiding weapons of mass
destruction such as nuclear bombs. This of course led to the
current war - something symbolized by Mars (the planet/god of war),
which in turn is the destination of Project Prometheus. (This
associative web hints at a nuclear event arising from the US-Iraq
What's more, in
II, I associated the 'false gift' warning with the 'Watcher'
which apparently inspired the design of the 'alien crop glyph' that
gave us the 'warning'. The
website primarily talks about Mars, 'fallen angels', and the anti-Christ
(another addition to the reversal theme). Adding to this is the
fact that the region of Iraq was once occupied by Sumer, the first high
civilization in history; and the name 'Sumer' happens to mean 'land of the
Watchers'. And it was also in ancient Mesopotamia/Sumer that the
Anunnaki - i.e. the 'fallen angels' (or 'Watchers' as they are
called in the Book of Enoch) - are said to have come down
from heaven to interact with man.
by inference it is now possible to associate the 'false gift warning'
with the war in Iraq/Sumer. Enhancing this is the
prevalent view that the US brought the 'gift' of
freedom to Iraq. (Supposedly the US 'liberated' the Iraqi
people on April 9, when Baghdad fell.)
The implication is obvious:
America's 'gift of freedom' to Iraq is a 'false gift' - as it is a
'false peace', a fascist Pax Americana, symbolized by the
Nazi/reversed swastika. (Note that the 'gift of liberty' directly
relates to the Statue of Liberty, a gift from France, the very country
vehemently opposing the US aggression against Iraq, thus echoing the
falseness of the US's claim of liberty/liberation.)
Isn't it eerily appropriate that
the Bush administration is often compared
to the Third Reich these days? More disturbingly, in fact, the Bush
family is even historically
a big supporter
of the Nazis!
there is definitely a dark, hidden - and 'prophetic' - side to the
unfolding world events. Speaking of prophetic, we should take another
Nostradamus' famous quatrain, X-72:
year 1999 seven months,
From the sky will come a great King of terror:
To bring back to life the great King of Angolmois,
Before after Mars to reign by good luck/happily
It pertains to our time (i.e.
'1999'), mentions 'terror', mentions 'Mars', alludes to peace/swastika
via 'good luck'/'happily', and creates a familiar contradiction - or 'reversal'
- through the juxtaposition of Mars/war and happiness/peace. Pretty
eerie, isn't it?
Anyway, I'll stop here for now.
The above only scratches the surface of the intricate 'game' being played...
indeed, the 'endgame'.
In Endgame IV, coming
soon, I will be discussing much more about all this -
especially how it relates to the 'stargate window' coming up later
"Out of this modern
civilization economic royalists carved new dynasties. New kingdoms
were built upon concentration of control over material things. Through
new uses of corporations, banks and securities, new machinery of
industry and agriculture, of labor and capital - all undreamed of by
the Fathers - the whole structure of modern life was impressed into
this royal service."
"Our allegiance to
American institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of
power. In vain they seek to hide behind the flag and the
Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the flag and the
Constitution stand for." —Franklin
"One of the illusions of
life is that the present hour is not the critical, decisive
It's just a matter of time...
(2) | '02
(1) | '01
© 2001-2003 Goro Adachi