Main Page

Etemenanki

During the middle of March, 2003, tbrnews received an email from a man who claimed to be a mid-level executive with a major American television network. He stated in this, and subsequent, emails that he was in possession of �thousands� of pages of in-house memos sent from his corporate headquarters in New York City to the head of the network�s television news department. He went on to say that these memos set forth directives about what material was, and was not, to be aired on the various outlets of the network.

This individual claimed he was developing serious doubts about the strict control of media events and decided that he would pass this material along to someone who might make use of it [i.e. TBRnews]...

Sounds intriguing, doesn't it? And it actually appears as if the memos could be genuine. And disturbing is the nature of the directives found in these memos. Here are a couple of example (underlines in original):

(Feb 26) Shots of GIs must show a mixed racial combination�.any interviews must reflect the youthful and idealistic, not the cynical point of view�the liberation of happy, enthusiastic Iraqis can be best shown by filming crowds of cheering citizens waving American flags. �of course, pictures of dead US military personnel are not to be shown and pictures of dead Iraqi soldiers should not show examples of violent death�

(March 10) ...pro-Government rallies are to be given the fullest coverage�if anti-Government demonstrations are shown, it is desired to stress either a very small number of �eccentrics� or shots of social misfits�

[More highlights here.]

Even if these memos are not genuine, they still accurately reflects what we've been seeing on American TV (especially on 'Faux News').

It is interesting to detect in more recent memos some nervousness as they hint at the potential fall of the Bush administration and discuss how to keep some distance from it (a parasite leaving its host, so to speak). And it's worth noting that they contain ominous info concerning what may potentially happen in the near future. Here are excerpts (underlines in original):

(July 12) ...If Bush has the same problems Nixon did over Watergate, we cannot be seen by our viewers as being blindly partisan. We have to have plausible deniability in this.

(July 14) ...There is a growing fear in counter intelligence circles that if the resistance movement in Iraq is not stopped, the resulting very bad PR might cause an �incident� somewhere in the US just before election time to whip the voters up to vote for Bush as a �wartime leader�... Someone in the FBI said to one of our people, entirely off the record, that quote it will probably be the Statue of Liberty endquote. There must be no speculation on this subject under any circumstances. If some rigged incident does happen and we comment on it in advance, new regulations could cause us serious problems �If this happens, it will be Rumsfeld who plans and executes it. This will give the President the usual deniability. It is more than likely that we will get some advance notice of such an action and then decisions can be made relative to going to the public.

Again, my feeling is that even if these memos are not 100% genuine, they likely reflect what is going on behind the scenes rather well. And that's a pretty disturbing thought.

On another subject, I'm planning a 'major presentation' later this week which has to do with a totally different but very important matter. I won't say what it is; just be prepared to be catapulted into another dimension! :)

In the mean time, here is a quote and some good links:

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." - Theodore Roosevelt

- Watching BushCo Crumble
- Why Commander in Chief Is Losing the War of the 16 Words
- Cheney's intelligence role scrutinized
- Classified Section of Sept. 11 Report Faults Saudi Rulers
- Reveal terrorism's backers
- The Amazing Stories of Condoleezza Rice

But the big news yesterday was the killing of Saddam's sons Oday and Qusay. A rare positive development for the Bush regime. And of course the White House just 'happened' to choose this opportunity - when public attention was focused elsewhere - to disclose very embarrassing information: that a high-ranking White House official was repeatedly warned by the CIA Director (the previous 'fall guy') about the dubious nature of the evidence for Iraq seeking uranium. As reported:

[Stephen] Hadley, [top aide to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice,] in a rare on-the-record session with reporters, said that he had received two memos from the CIA and a phone call from agency Director George Tenet last October raising objections to an allegation that Iraq was seeking to buy uranium ore from Africa to use in building nuclear weapons.

And Hadley claims it just 'slipped from his attention as the State of the Union was being put together'. Yeah, I hate when that happens. But hey, it's only about nuclear weapons - who cares, right?!

And then Hadley said 'my bad; should I resign?', and Bush responded 'oh that's okay, you're doing a great job; please stay'. Who do they think they are fooling with this pathetic charade?

Do they really think we are too stupid to know that the scandal can be traced back to Vice President Cheney and his neo-con minions lurking in and around the administration? (Bush himself is probably just a 'useful idiot' in this, though he should also be held responsible.) It's just a matter of time, though. Drip, drip, drip... The dam will collapse.

Look at the British counterpart and we get a hint of what's in store. Prime Minister Tony Blair is quickly approaching his end - especially with the very suspicious recent death of Iraq weapons expert David Kelly, who leaked information damaging to Blair. It's getting very messy over there. Blair should have known that aligning with the out-of-control Bush regime would be a political suicide.

Here are some good links with useful information:

- Blood in the Water: Watergate II
- Special Prosecutor's Investigation Needed for the WMDs Mess
- First it was Clinton, now Bush faces impeachment
- Wolfowitz Committee Wanted Iraq/Uranium Ref In Pres Speech 
- Dean: 16 Questions For Bush
- Oct. Report Said Defeated Hussein Would Be Threat
- Why does 9/11 inquiry scare Bush?
- If You're Not Paranoid, You're Not Paying Attention

When President Bush told the nation, incorrectly, that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from Africa, he did so despite being warned by the CIA that it wasn't true, CBS News has learned exclusively.

This apparently marks the beginning of the major US media networks' long-overdue attack on the Bush administration. It represents a big step in the quickening progress toward the projected 'fall' (see Endgame V). It does seem the 'board of directors' behind the scenes are no longer willing or able to protect the Bush administration as it had been since 9/11. Interestingly, today is a 'Sept 11' - since sept means 'seven' (September was originally the seventh month). I can almost see Zeus' thunderbolt striking the chariot of the sun...

I'd say the scandal is no longer smoldering; it's about to become a big fire storm, and right on schedule so far. What goes up must come down; and Bush went way up there. This one is going to be very messy. (What will Karl Rove do now? He may well try something drastic to try to save the sinking Titanic... This is a critical time and should be interesting/disturbing to watch.)

Another work in progress, particular important in my view, is the activation of the 'Time Rivers' section of my website, which will technically be outside of Etemenanki. It will obviously deal with the Time River theory presented in my book. I just feel it is time to begin 'leaking' the information to the web.  (By the way, if you have already read the book, I'd love to hear your comments - email me your thoughts.)

I'm also thinking about reactivating Psi Sessions. But the problem here is that I'm not sure I can motivate 'X' to do any more sessions. It could be that I'll just have to find another 'X'. So if anyone out there wants to try it, let me know.

In the mean time, here are some links worth checking out - if nothing else then to stimulate our mind often confused and sedated by the pathetic US mainstream media:

- Beyond Bush - Part I
- What is happening in America?
- Did Bush Mislead US Into War?
- The Attack Has Been Spectacular
- U.S. report on 9/11 to be 'explosive'
- Bush: 'The Wrong Man?'
- The Carlyle Group considered Bush useless 
- Bigger Than Watergate! (rigged election)
- Mad Cowboy Disease

This was a $15 million, remotely piloted, and solar-powered "one of a kind" aerial vehicle being tested by NASA, called Helios. In Endgame V, we discussed how the potential fall of Bush would parallel the mythical story about the 'son of the sun/Helios' called Pha�thon who lost control of the 'chariot of the sun' and fell into Eridanus, the 'Ocean Stream', which became his grave (analogous to the 'tomb of Osiris'). Well, NASA's 'Helios' - which is obviously a 'solar vehicle' in that it was solar- powered and the name 'Helios' denotes the sun - could easily be viewed as a 'chariot of the sun' that crashed... into the Pacific Ocean.

What's more, the Helios plane had set an altitude record two years ago on August 13, '01 - as if to allude to the 2-year cycle pattern that is inseparable from the upcoming 'stargate window' this summer/fall (i.e. what is theoretically being foreshadowed by this 'preview event'). I'd say the symbolism is quite significant.

Another interesting event observed on the same day as the Helios crash was the death of Strom Thurmond, former senator, at the age of 100. What's interesting about this is that Thurmond was a key figure in one of the events of the 'December window' last year. The fall of senate majority leader Trent Lott, which represented a downgraded version of the 'Babylon leader falling' theme attached to the window (as well as the 'stargate window'), was a direct result of Lott praising Thurmond's segregationist past. So, there seems to be a curious and ominous echo effect here.

There is actually much more to the 'preview' window, which I will discuss later on. This was just a little update.

But I am actually more interested in what's happening with SOHO at this time. And somehow... Roswell, where a 'UFO' supposedly crashed in 1947 (around July 4). More later...

As we entered the month of June, there is suddenly a growing rumbling of a major scandal in the air. And this all stems from the simple question: 'Where the hell are the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction?'

In a recent news article, for example, it was written:

When all three major US newsweeklies - Time, Newsweek and US News & World Report - run major features on the same day on possible government lying, you can bet you have the makings of a major scandal. [...]

"This is potentially very serious," said one Congressional aide. "If it's shown we went to war because of intelligence that was 'cooked' by the administration, heads will have to roll, and not just little heads, big ones."

And John W. Dean, a law expert, similarly writes in his column 'Is Lying About The Reason For War An Impeachable Offense?':

In the three decades since Watergate, this is the first potential scandal I have seen that could make Watergate pale by comparison. If the Bush Administration intentionally manipulated or misrepresented intelligence to get Congress to authorize, and the public to support, military action to take control of Iraq, then that would be a monstrous misdeed. [...]

[T]his Administration may be due for a scandal. While Bush narrowly escaped being dragged into Enron, it was not, in any event, his doing. But the war in Iraq is all Bush's doing, and it is appropriate that he be held accountable.

To put it bluntly, if Bush has taken Congress and the nation into war based on bogus information, he is cooked.

Here is another article (Ex-Official: Evidence Distorted for War):

The Bush administration distorted intelligence and presented conjecture as evidence to justify a U.S. invasion of Iraq, according to a retired intelligence official who served during the months before the war.

"What disturbs me deeply is what I think are the disingenuous statements made from the very top about what the intelligence did say," said Greg Thielmann, who retired last September. "The area of distortion was greatest in the nuclear field."

Unless they find some WMDs in Iraq, then, the current situation is just a tame prelude to what's likely to develop in the coming months.

While this was something I was saving for my next article, Endgame V, I guess this is a good place to mention that the fall of Bush - a 'Babylon leader' along with Saddam, the Pope, etc. - is one of the likely  scenarios projected to manifest in, or in association with the 'stargate window' this coming summer/fall (discussed in the Endgame IV article). And I have been dropping hints about this potential development since before the Iraq war. (Actually, as early as December 2000 - during the US presidential election fiasco - I was saying that 'the next president [i.e. Bush] may not last long' or that '[the next] presidents will in some way mark the end of presidency or the United States as it exists today.)

In any case, it would be interesting to see what the Bush team will do to try to counteract the tide now turning against them. Karl Rove and all the neo-conservatives surrounding Bush are a ruthless bunch, so it's difficult to imagine them just sitting quietly and letting it gain momentum. The most effective way to stop the growing criticism is to find WMDs in Iraq. But even they must be realizing at this time that there may be no WMDs to be found there. So the question is: Will they plant weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to justify their position?

This is a legitimate question since, as more and more people are coming to realize, the Bush administration doesn't hesitate to use deception to get what they want. If deemed likely to succeed, they probably won't think twice about making a fake discovery of Iraqi WMDs to silence their critics.

It is useful to know that according to the philosophy of Leo Strauss, who influenced many neo-cons, it is necessary for the elite rulers to create perpetual war and deception to control the populace. And if needed, it tells us, it is perfectly okay to manufacture an external threat to achieve the perpetual state of war. So, why would the neo-cons - if they really are devoted followers of Strauss - hesitate to plant some WMDs in Iraq?

The only thing stopping them from implementing the deception may be the quite widespread anticipation of just such an action in the minds of the still-thinking segment of the general public. But with the mounting pressure pushing Team Bush into a corner at this time, they just might go ahead with it soon. And they should know that the clock is ticking because it appears there is only a small, one or two-month window to pull it off.

The key here is that there is a crucial difference between the issue of the existence of Iraqi WMDs and the issue of Team Bush lying about the danger posed by Iraq in justifying the war. If it turns out that - as it is likely - the Bush administration manipulated intelligence data to support their case for war, then the matter of whether or not there was any WMD in Iraq becomes more or less irrelevant. Lying to the American people in order to drag the nation into a war is unconstitutional. It is a high crime. If it can be proven that the administration was dishonest in how they presented the information for the war, then it doesn't matter Iraq really had WMDs or cooperated with al Qaeda. The initial deception itself should be enough for some serious head rolling.

So for Team Bush it is not enough to find/plant WMDs; they need to do it before congressional investigations make it clear to the general public that the administration committed a crime. It would be vital for them to mislead people into thinking that the discovery of Iraqi WMDs makes everything okay (i.e. 'the end justifies the means'). Assuming that investigations will begin this summer, the Bush administration has only few months to successfully pull off this potential deception. (But if they do decide to manufacture evidence, I'd say there is a strong possibility that it too will be shown to be what it truly is, and dramatically worsen the situation.)

Of course, there is another probable scenario that would help counter the turning pendulum: another '9/11'. Renewed chaos and fear should work very well for them just about now. And this would again tie in with the 'stargate window' around Sept. '03, which is projected to be the 'echo window' of 9/11.

As I wrote in the pre-war Feb. 18 update here: "I was not particularly concerned about [the] short-term development [of the US-Iraq conflict]. I'm more interested in seeing how the situation could develop into a 'climax' during the 'stargate window'."

In my view, the 'storm' is coming one way or another.

European critics of the Iraq war expressed shock Friday at published remarks by a senior U.S. official playing down Iraq's weapons of mass destruction as the reason for the conflict. [...]

In an interview in the next issue of Vanity Fair magazine, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz cited "bureaucratic reasons" for focusing on Saddam Hussein's alleged arsenal [...] "For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on," Wolfowitz was quoted as saying. [source]

Of course, those of us still capable of seeing through all the mainstream media-assisted propaganda BS already knew this from the beginning. But now the neo-conservatives surrounding Bush led by Wolfowitz, who had been obsessed with toppling Saddam and getting Iraq's oil long before 9/11, have the audacity to publicly admit that they lied to the American people and the rest of the world to get what they wanted - a key step toward achieving their ultimate goal of creating a global 'Pax Americana' empire.

We should be outraged and demanding the removal of those who knowingly created and endorsed the big deception.

It should be realized that many of the Bush administration's actions come straight out of the Nazi playbook.

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."

"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State." �Joseph Goebbels, German Minister of Propaganda, 1933-1945

Is this comparison unreasonable? Well, consider this: US Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz is a disciple of Leo Strauss (1899-1973), a Zionist-fascist philosopher, who in turn was directly influenced/mentored by Martin Heidegger, the leading ideologue of the Third Reich, and Carl Schmitt, the Nazi legal architect. The philosophical/political views of the neo-conservatives now in power in the Bush administration, in other words, can be traced straight back to the Nazi regime.

No wonder there is fascism in the darkening air these days, eh? How much longer will we allow this deadly cancer to spread? How much longer will we, by remaining silent, continue to empower the closet fascists aligned with pure greed that is corporate America? The American people have the right to remain silent, but those brave ones whose allegiance is to the spirit of truth, justice, and freedom - i.e. what America should stand for - know it's time to exercise their freedom to speak out against the corrupt authority.

Prepare yourself before delving into this one as it is big... both in size and impact.

I'm pretty tired from writing it, so I'll go rest... :)

It is my ultimate challenge to 'reality', and reality hasn't been challenged like this before, I don't think. :) Hopefully this will trigger the opening of the 'floodgate'...

The secret is finally out.

Actually, it's only the beginning... of the 'Endgame'.

It is true that many Iraqis are genuinely pleased that the tyrant is no longer on the throne in Baghdad - but that's not really the key issue. What is insidiously important is the real agenda of the US, or more accurately the Bush administration.

Did the US invade Iraq to liberate its people? Wasn't the original goal supposedly to disarm Saddam, who the Bush administration strongly suspected had weapons of mass destruction? Weren't we told that it was necessary to invade Iraq immediately because its leader was a crazy tyrant who would not hesitate to use WMD against the US and others?

Well, so where are those dangerous weapons and why hasn't Saddam used any of them against the invading enemy? For a tyrant who supposedly rivals Hitler, he sure hasn't been aggressive at all in this war. (Of course, at this point the Bush regime is acting as if the liberation of the Iraqi people was the reason for the invasion.) This awkward situation suggests that: A) Iraq does not have WMD, B) Saddam has them but is humane enough to not use them even if that means his reign coming to an end, C) Saddam is already dead, D) Saddam made a secret deal with the US, or E) Saddam has a plan to use them in an unexpected way later in the war.

I can think of some more possibilities, but in any case the easy 'victory' so far for the US is not necessarily good news for the invading force. Whatever the immediate outcome, by pre-emptively attacking Iraq the US has opened a Pandora's Box.

America is no longer a role model that it used to be for many nations around the world; it is now an unruly 'cop' that does what it pleases. America no longer leads by example, it now rules by force... and it is addicted to oil. The United States has been reduced to a bully that everybody continues to follow but actually despises.

Sadly, it is quite clear that the Bush administration is driven by hidden agendas on many levels. One has to do with world domination - a 'Pax Americana' or 'American peace' - envisioned by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). It's a plan drawn up by neo-conservatives for people like Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), Jeb Bush, and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff).

For all intents and purposes, the US is trying to become a global 'empire'. And by crushing the Iraq regime, it is kick-starting this ambitious, and frankly arrogant, process. You might want to follow the links provided below and read about the ugliness that exists just beneath the surface.

- Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President
- Defence redefined means securing cheap energy
- A think tank war: Why old Europe says no
- The president's real goal in Iraq
- The West's battle for oil
- Mesopotamia. Babylon. The Tigris and Euphrates

9/11 was not the root cause of all the recent US aggression; 9/11 was instead a big opportunity. The dream of a Pax Americana was already in existence before 9/11. In fact, the terrorist attacks were so beneficial to the hidden plan that we can't help but wonder if 9/11 was... well, let's not go there at this time.

Indeed, as far as those arrogant dreamers behind the plan are concerned, the reign of Bush must be a golden window of opportunity. An intellectually disabled leader - friendly to them/corporate America - is installed in the White House, leading a powerful but increasingly mindless nation, which is manipulated into supporting the leader who has no clothes. All the checks and balances are now pretty much gone; the media is turning into a corporate puppet; patriotism is used as a weapon against freedom and individual rights; democracy is under attack; the nation doesn't realize it's being raped and it's actually screaming for more... This is a depressing and very dangerous situation.

The point is, 'they' can pretty much do whatever they want during this 'Perfect Storm'. Very little resistance now, and no responsibility later (Bush is the shield for that)... They are enjoying raping Lady Liberty here in the US still reeling from 9/11, and elsewhere creating fictitious wars for oil and domination... During this Storm, they can get away with almost anything.

The ironic thing is, it's all done in the name of 'peace'. Indeed, 'peace' is the key underlying theme for today's world events.

In a sense, it may be that the current situation is being facilitated by an unseen 'force' with a wider perspective which is allowing the destabilization to take place so that the 'trouble makers' on this planet would kill each other off or self-destruct -- thus paving the way for a new beginning for humanity. It's a 'Project Phoenix' (AKA 'Osirian Resurrection').

Who are the 'trouble makers'? Well, this is where we come back to the 'Babylon falling' theme discussed in my recent articles. The 'Project Phoenix' seems to be about striking down Babylon, the Tower of Babel, as dramatically signaled by the destruction of the WTC towers.

'Babylon' is the gateway between heaven and earth; but it is also the corrupt authority that has inserted itself between man and 'God'. The latter manifestation of 'Babylon', as I have discussed before, is represented by the US, Iraq, and the Church (Israel and Mars could join the list also). In terms of religion, 'Babylon' is Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. And we have Washington DC/NYC, Baghdad, Rome, and Jerusalem as prominent 'Babylon cities', i.e. cities of corruption.

The cities of corruption, ironically, are also 'cities of peace'.

Baghdad, the modern incarnation of the ancient city Babylon that sat slightly to the southwest, was originally called Madinat as-Salam, 'City of Peace'. Washington DC is 'District of Columbia', which denotes 'District of Peace' as Columbia derives from 'Columba', Noah's Dove; the dove is a universal symbol of peace. (So the US itself, i.e. Columbia, is a 'nation of peace'.) Jerusalem, the eye of the religious storm, has a name denoting 'city of peace' (or 'foundation of peace'). And Rome (Roma), the center of Catholicism, is Amor - meaning 'love' - spelled in reverse.

While 'love' is not quite 'peace', it's interesting to note that the term 'Catholic' means 'universal', which would then be relatable to the decommissioned Russian space station, Mir - as the name means 'world' (i.e. 'universe'). It happens that 'Mir' can also mean 'peace'.

What's more, the name 'Islam' is often said to mean 'peace', and the hidden plan currently driving the US aggression is the vision of a 'Pax Americana', i.e. 'American peace'.

The unfortunate implication is that 'peace' in the emerging context seems to mean just the opposite - war. It's all reversed. And so like Mir and the shuttle Columbia, 'peace' is falling to its demise.

The fiery fall of Mir - 'world/peace' - in March 2001 was closely followed by 9/11, which I think most of us would agree was an unmistakable trigger for the end of 'world peace' (and of course of the 'World' Trade Center towers). The Columbia disaster on Feb. 1 this year - a 'peace disaster' - was immediately followed by the controversial Iraq war that is further threatening world peace. And as if these weren't enough, it was announced just yesterday that British Airways and Air France has decided to permanently ground Concorde - starting this summer. 'Concorde' means 'peace'. Ominous? Yes.

Another remarkable 'sign' was Project Prometheus announced in January this year - a NASA project (nuclear propulsion system) hoped to lead to sending man to Mars. I have already discussed the significance of the 'Prometheus' symbolism in my previous updates, but what I haven't mentioned is the fat that Prometheus, the mythological giver of fire, can be represented (via 'pramantha') by the swastika. This ancient symbol traditionally signifies none other than peace! And following our 'reversal' theme, let's turn the symbol around - which gives us the 'sinistroverse' swastika used by the Nazis, synonymous with, not peace, but terror.

The Nazis, of course, are a major theme discussed in my articles Endgame II and 1999: Final Solution. Particularly in the former, I discussed how the Nazis' technological legacy is very pertinent to the present time. In connection with the puzzling message decoded from an 'alien glyph' that appeared in England last year, I discussed how the 'false gift' mentioned in the apparent warning relates to the Nazis' ultra-secret 'stargate' technology that was likely smuggled into the US after the war. Fittingly enough, Prometheus is popularly known for giving the gift of fire to man.

Now consider this: the goal of Project Prometheus is to develop a nuclear propulsion system for interplanetary travel; the announcement of the project coincided with the US accusing Iraq of hiding weapons of mass destruction such as nuclear bombs. This of course led to the current war - something symbolized by Mars (the planet/god of war), which in turn is the destination of Project Prometheus. (This associative web hints at a nuclear event arising from the US-Iraq war.)

What's more, in Endgame II, I associated the 'false gift' warning with the 'Watcher' website - which apparently inspired the design of the 'alien crop glyph' that gave us the 'warning'. The website primarily talks about Mars, 'fallen angels', and the anti-Christ (another addition to the reversal theme). Adding to this is the fact that the region of Iraq was once occupied by Sumer, the first high civilization in history; and the name 'Sumer' happens to mean 'land of the Watchers'. And it was also in ancient Mesopotamia/Sumer that the Anunnaki - i.e. the 'fallen angels' (or 'Watchers' as they are called in the Book of Enoch) - are said to have come down from heaven to interact with man.

So, by inference it is now possible to associate the 'false gift warning' with the war in Iraq/Sumer. Enhancing this is the prevalent view that the US brought the 'gift' of freedom to Iraq. (Supposedly the US 'liberated' the Iraqi people on April 9, when Baghdad fell.)

The implication is obvious: America's 'gift of freedom' to Iraq is a 'false gift' - as it is a 'false peace', a fascist Pax Americana, symbolized by the Nazi/reversed swastika. (Note that the 'gift of liberty' directly relates to the Statue of Liberty, a gift from France, the very country vehemently opposing the US aggression against Iraq, thus echoing the falseness of the US's claim of liberty/liberation.)

Isn't it eerily appropriate that the Bush administration is often compared to the Third Reich these days? More disturbingly, in fact, the Bush family is even historically a big supporter of the Nazis!

So there is definitely a dark, hidden - and 'prophetic' - side to the unfolding world events. Speaking of prophetic, we should take another look at Nostradamus' famous quatrain, X-72:

The year 1999 seven months,
From the sky will come a great King of terror:
To bring back to life the great King of Angolmois,
Before after Mars to reign by good luck/happily

It pertains to our time (i.e. '1999'), mentions 'terror', mentions 'Mars', alludes to peace/swastika via 'good luck'/'happily', and creates a familiar contradiction - or 'reversal' - through the juxtaposition of Mars/war and happiness/peace. Pretty eerie, isn't it?

Anyway, I'll stop here for now. The above only scratches the surface of the intricate 'game' being played... indeed, the 'endgame'.

In Endgame IV, coming soon, I will be discussing much more about all this - especially how it relates to the 'stargate window' coming up later this year.

"Out of this modern civilization economic royalists carved new dynasties. New kingdoms were built upon concentration of control over material things. Through new uses of corporations, banks and securities, new machinery of industry and agriculture, of labor and capital - all undreamed of by the Fathers - the whole structure of modern life was impressed into this royal service."

"Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of power. In vain they seek to hide behind the flag and the Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the flag and the Constitution stand for." �Franklin D. Roosevelt

"One of the illusions of life is that the present hour is not the critical, decisive hour." �Ralph Waldo Emerson

It's just a matter of time...

Archive: '03 (1) | '02 (2) | '02 (1) | '01  |  '99-'00