Revelations at the End of Time
Tale of Tower, Mars, Holy Grail & Antichrist



The Lucifer Time Code: Part 2

The Lucifer Time Code: Part 1

Endgame VI
'Dawn of Darkness'
Hidden Colors of Mars...
The West Wing Cipher
Endgame V
'On the Chariot of the Sun'
Endgame IV
'Stargate 2003'
Endgame III
'The Baphomet Revelation'
Endgame II
'...Countdown to Zero Point'
'Odyssey & Martian Trojan Horse'



The Time Rivers

Join the Revolution...



Where Imagination And Reality Unite
Symbology | Esoterica | Mythology | Philosophy | Prophecies


Thoughts On Martian New World


Excerpts from my past writings...

From Mystery, Babylon the Great (Oct. 25, 2001):

The 911 event being a symbolic reenactment of the Flood (i.e. destruction of 'Atlantis'), wouldn't the pattern dictate that the next event be a mass 'Exodus'? Could it be just a coincidence that I conceptually equated President Bush with Moses in The Two Suns of Election MM [article] last year?

But where would be the destination of this 'Exodus'? Where is our 'Promised Land'?

You guessed it: Mars.

The world events today appear to be symbolically anticipating mankind's imminent migration to the Red Planet... 

America is no longer the 'New World'. Mars is.

From ending paragraph of Endgame II (October 16, 2002):

Things are moving fast now. Mankind is about to move into a New World. It's Mars, it's hyperspace, it's Psi -- it's 'the other side'. But like crossing the Atlantic, the transition will not be easy. The 21st Century is the era of this momentous shift for mankind, and we are about to be given a 'fire'. Unless we learn to handle the fire with respect and great care, there is a good chance that the ship of human civilization will be found at the bottom of the abyss in the next century.

From 'The Adachi Report' (December 2002; currently not available):

So here we have a quite reasonable solution to the issue of the American timeline terminating at the beginning of the 21st century. If nothing else, it would be the end of the idea of the ‘New World’ attached to America – because that epithet is currently being passed on to the next new frontier, Mars. Perhaps we are to consider the first rash of Mars probes in the 1970s as the Martian version of ‘Columbus’ and the period between then and c. 2000 [...] as the exploration phase of the Red Planet reflecting the first 50-100 years of America after Columbus.

The next phase in the new century would naturally involve the colonization of Mars – which is likely to be initiated very soon, certainly before 2020. Obviously, it would be ‘one giant leap’ for the evolution of human civilization. Mars is about to become the second home for mankind, and this appears to be occurring in precise accordance with the ‘timetable’ set by the [Time River system].

Humanity’s closer relationship with the Red Planet will also entail humanity’s deeper understanding of its own past, which will give man clearer insights into the significance of our own time and where we are collectively about to go. Mars has only begun to reveal its dark secrets to us, and there is so much more that it can tell us about reality and ourselves.

From August 28, 2003 post:


As expected, the Mars 'climax day' - Aug. 27 - was relatively calm. But of course Mars itself was/is awesome in the night sky.

And as anticipated, the key day gave us subtle clues to acknowledge the familiar underlying 'pattern' and hint at what may be coming in the near future.


Another interesting event, which took place on Aug. 26 (just a day before the 'Mars day'), was the release of the final report on the Shuttle Columbia disaster. The combination of NASA and Mars here is obviously too fitting to be mere coincidence.

And this leads to the point I made in the Aug. 23 update, i.e. the prospect of mankind visiting and colonizing the Red Planet, the next New World. What is happening today - or what the Osirian Resurrection means - is essentially the activation of the Age of Horus/Osiris, that is, the 'Age of Mars' for human civilization. This is the 'game' of the 21st century.

The 'activation' does not come about easily because of the inertia of what our space program has become (i.e. no vision) and people's general lack of interest. The system has to be shaken and shocked into changing its course. It takes something big to accomplish that - like the Columbia disaster, and the subsequent report blaming the dysfunctional culture of NASA for the disaster.

Because of Columbia and the scathing report, there is now indeed a building pressure on NASA to change. And in the mainstream news media we're beginning to see comments like this:

NASA needs an inspiring leader, not just a competent manager, to guide it out of this wilderness and set a course for the next decade and beyond.

And because of the timing of the release of the Columbia report, we inevitably look at the sky and say to each other: 'Why don't we go to Mars? Kennedy was a great leader and he pretty much took us to the Moon. Why not again try something inspiring like that?'

And so psychologically we are definitely being pushed to pay attention to the new New World, now shining brilliantly in the night sky. It is of course no coincidence 'Columbia' is another name for the United States, the New World. Because for the next New World to rise, the old one must fall, which the space shuttle Columbia did symbolically. It's all very poetic really (and there is more to this story). [...]

From October 10, 2003 post:

'Seeds of the Future'

So Arnold Schwarzenegger was elected Governor of California just as anticipated. No surprise there, but this was a big event for the 'stargate window'. In fact the 2-month period covering Arnie's Total Recall election, from Aug. 6 to Oct. 7, seems to have come to define the 'stargate window', with the 'rise of Machine' effectively fulfilling the projected main event for the window, i.e. the 'resurrection of Osiris'.

As discussed before, the 'Osirian resurrection' entails, as per ancient Egyptian tradition, the simultaneous occurrences of the death of the Osiris and the birth of Horus, the son of Osiris. The rise of Arnie corresponds to the birth of Horus whereas Osiris' death corresponds to the fall of the Osirian President, George W. Bush (or at least his administration/policies), via the collapse of his neocon-driven unilateral/preemptive war policies and the related 'Treasongate' matter involving the Wilson/CIA leak.

So now the seeds have been sown, and the stage is set for the 'game' to fully unfold. We have 'entered the gate', so to speak. And all the signs are that this 'game' is going to be momentous; in my view it is set up to be the 'endgame' for the United States in particular. What is at stake is the survival of the nation itself.

From the perspective of the glass being half full, what is taking place could be interpreted as a necessary cleansing before the birth of a new age... of 'Horus', as ending and beginning are always together. As one New World ends, the next New World begins. And we have just recently been introduced to the next New World - Mars, called 'Horus the Red' in ancient Egypt, which was an abnormally brilliant light in the night sky this summer/fall, i.e. during the stargate window. This was also hinted not so subtly by the 'Total Recall' election that gave birth to an earthly 'Horus', Schwarzenegger. After all, the film Total Recall featuring Arnie was all about the Red Planet.

The cosmic 'announcement' of the beginning of the Martian New World this summer was also a signal for the end of the American New World. This was the underlying theme of the 'stargate window', and we can accordingly view the earthly events that took place during the window as 'seeds' of the coming 'destruction' of America... the US. The clock is now ticking, and we have to wonder whether the infamous ending date of the Mayan calendar - 2012 - pertains to this, in essence, 'end of the world'. (Note that the Mayans inhabited Central America, part of the New World.)

Another 'clock' is the timing of man setting foot on the Red Planet. This 'Columbus moment' will definitely signify the passing of the torch and the beginning of a whole new chapter in the history of human civilization. Likely it is somewhere between 2010 and 2020 that this will take place. So most of us will be around to witness this momentous interplanetary transition process. Of course, those of us in the United States might not see it as a positive thing as, by then, we could be facing so much mess. Indeed, it is my view that things are set up so that the US won't be allowed to directly move on to Mars. In a sense, its high-powered 'corruption' is not to go beyond this blue planet... as it has to become 'history', so to speak. To put it another way, the old system (or 'Matrix', if you like) is not welcome in the next New World, which is conceptually quite natural.

In this light, it is certainly noteworthy that China is now about to make history by launching its first human into space. And this is expected to happen next week! Now think about this. Earlier this 'year of Mars', the space shuttle Columbia disaster forced the US to halt all of its shuttle flights. The US thus has no manned space flight capability this year. Contrast this with the Chinese suddenly coming around to send man into space near the end of the stargate/Martian window... Well, I'd say we are seeing a little preview of what is to come.

The traditional 'redness' of the nation of China also makes it a rather fitting country to play a big role in the saga of the Martian New World. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if the Chinese suddenly announced that they had decided to go to the Red Planet. But I would also monitor Japan closely - it is after all the 'Land of the Rising Sun'. Since the 'rising sun' embodies Horus, and Horus is analogous to Mars, Japan can be viewed as the 'Land of Mars'. The Japanese national flag prominently featuring a red disk seems to support this interpretation as well.

Because of the inherent competitiveness embedded in the psyche of the US, it will take something drastic to keep it from trying to become a major player in the 'race' to Mars. The Columbia disaster was probably the first step. Frankly, I'm not even sure if the US will be 'allowed' to send any more Americans to space after this year.

And of course, it's not just about the space program - since we are likely looking at the 'termination' of the United States itself, the timing of which is controlled by the same 'clock' regulating man's migration to the Red Planet. So we are talking about a timeframe of 10 to 15 years for the American 'termination', at the most. [...]

From January 1, 2004 post:

'Seeds of Tomorrow'

So here we are... 2004. The way I view this new year is that it will involve an escalating movement in the direction set in 2003. I would say that during the foregoing eventful 'year of Mars' and 'stargates', seeds of the next phase of the 'endgame' were sown and we are about to see them grow into the inevitable. Good or bad, the key choices were made and we went through a major 'gate'... The stage is set for the rest of the story - the 'endgame' - to just unfold like a roller coaster coming down from the peak. That's the kind of imagery I would associate with 2004 and onward.

While 2003 was not a positive year in general, with the very questionable Iraq invasion being the biggest event and all, we could still say that we were very lucky that no WMDs - or anything remotely resembling them - were found in Iraq. Otherwise, the world would have witnessed the US, pushed by the increasingly confident and arrogant Cheney/neocon camp, continuing to attack other nations like Iran and Syria as called for by the pre-9/11 PNAC paper (the neocon 'bible'). And chances are, if it wasn't for the complete non-discovery of WMDs, we would've easily already seen the careless usage of nuclear weapons by the US against those 'evil' states that dared to put up a fight. (Cheney apparently wants to use nukes and he's been just looking for any excuse to do so.)

Nonetheless, the Bush administration did unnecessarily invade another nation, Iraq, through the shameless and Nazi-like usage of 'big lies', and the key 'seeds' of the future were sown. In the past I wrote repeatedly about 2003 being the 'year of Mars' and the relevance of the related theme of the Benben stone/'All-Seeing Eye' (i.e. the apex stone of the pyramid - often associated with the New World Order). I'd like to point out here that the Benben stone is often consider to have been a meteorite and traditionally it was associated with the notion of sex/seeding. The term 'pyramid' is etymologically related to fire, as in Mars the 'fire planet', and the magnificent Giza pyramids are inseparable from the 'Martian monument' that is the Great Sphinx (a representation of Horus as is Mars). Scientists today also realize that it could plausibly have been Martian rocks that 'seeded' earth in the distant past.

So the combination of both Mars and the Benben stone being attached to the year 2003 certainly conjures up the concept of the Red Planet approaching close to Earth - as it did in mid-2003 - for cosmic 'seeding'. And as per 'as above, so below', the most significant world event of 2003 was the US descending onto Iraq - which was a very 'Martian' attack on a 'Martian' land. (And Mars is the god/planet of war.)

As already discussed in Endgame IV, the beginning of the 'war' coincided with the spring equinox (March 20) which is none other than the very special day when the Great Sphinx (a 'Martian' monument facing due east) aligns with the rising sun, the latter being another manifestation of Horus (= Sphinx/Mars). Note that the involvement of the Sun here resonates with the Benben stone whose traditional home in ancient Egypt was Heliopolis, literally the 'city of the sun'.

What's more, the lifeblood of Iraq, the Tigris-Euphrates river system, has its mouth exactly at latitude 30°N, i.e. the very latitude of Giza and Cairo (the 'city of Mars'). And, the said river's mouth is situated exactly due east of Giza - meaning the eternal gaze of the Great Sphinx is directly 'looking' at the end point of the Tigris-Euphrates, thus in effect connecting the end/edge of the Nile (where the Sphinx sits) and the end of the Tigris-Euphrates.

As I revealed in my book (which you should have read already - get with the program! :) ), this virtual 'bridge' represented by the Giza monument signifies a stargate-like shift in time - a 'jump' from the 'main stream' (the Nile) to the 'hyper stream' (Tigris-Euphrates). In the 'Time River Theory', this 'edge'/'end' point at 30°N, where time jumps, marks the 21st century (i.e. our own time) on the timeline encoded into the design of the Nile. And the strongly suggested implication I found here was that the 'time jump' (or time bifurcation) would signify the timeline of human civilization moving on to the Red Planet, resulting in the creation of a new timeline quite separate from the original timeline flowing on Earth.

Consequently in the Time River model the river system of Iraq, the Tigris-Euphrates, has come to represent the 'Martian' timeline(s). The ancient land of Iraq, therefore, has become analogous to Mars. I should also mention that in the Time River scheme, the Tigris-Euphrates is an intelligently 'transposed' version of the Blue Nile and Atbara, which are the main tributaries of the Nile rising in Ethiopia and joining the main Nile in Sudan. (Check out my paper, The Nile Decoded, for a brief summary of this.) The confluence of the Euphrates/Blue Nile and the main Nile at Khartoum happens to mark on the encoded river timeline 4000 BC - i.e. the beginning of history when the first high civilization suddenly rose in Sumer, i.e. the location of today's Iraq!

So our immediate future is somehow 'hyperdimensionally' linked to the beginning of history... Genesis. Some form of 'time travel' is actually a real possibility here. And it's likely to come about in connection with Mars. The increasingly plausible scenario is that history, or human civilization, was 'seeded' by future intelligence coming via the 'stargate' that is Mars. Oh my... I know this is very out there :) But that's what the 'map of time' - i.e. the Time River scheme created by some mysterious 'intelligence' - strongly suggests! As I often say, going to Mars (as mankind is now just a decade or two away from doing) is analogous to going back to 'Genesis'.

That's the context in which the biggest event of the 'year of Mars', 2003, should be viewed. The Iraq invasion was a terrestrial simulation of man's imminent migration to Mars/Genesis that will result in a cosmic 'seeding'. And in this 'simulation' (or 'pre-echo') witnessed in 2003, its own version of 'seeding' took place.

Iraq is the land of Mars/Genesis, and the United States/invasion was the 'seeding'. By watching the development of the Iraq situation, we should be able to learn quite a lot about the nature of the coming interplanetary 'seeding' process directly involving the Red Planet, which is already beginning to take shape as we speak. (Project Prometheus, considered to lead to manned mission to Mars, was announced early in 2003, and the Bush administration is now widely thought to be getting ready to announce, as early as this month, its ambitious plan to send man back to the Moon and then to Mars.) Conversely, by applying the projected 'big picture', some recognizable patterns should continue to emerge from the development of Iraq, giving us a form of foresight. [...]

From January 7, 2004 post:

'Martian Politics'

[...] Of course, it could be that the Martian landscape is really as red as the NASA version shows. But given that it's scientifically acceptable for the Martian sky to be more or less blue, combined with the fact that we have quite compelling photographic evidence [...] from the Viking missions exposing the excessive redness of the original pictures released by NASA [...], it is not so farfetched to suppose that NASA has been deceiving all of us about the real appearance of Mars all these years.

But why would NASA - or some small group within/behind the agency - fake the color of Mars, you ask? Good question. :) And the answer here might have to do with the fact that the 'real' colors of Mars are too Earth-like - i.e. too inviting for humans. If the timetable of the hidden 'master plan' was not yet ready for mankind's migration to the Red Planet, then there would have to be steps taken to reduce the general population's desire to explore the new frontier, the next New World, so that the eventuality might be delayed. And this could be achieved in part by making Mars appear 'alien' and inhospitable...

With this model in mind, the latest Mars picture would represent evidence that the 'game' - the deception - may be still continuing. Now let us recall the recent failure of the European Beagle 2 lander deployed by Mars Express, scheduled to land on Christmas Day. Beagle 2 would have been the first non-NASA probe to successfully land on the Red Planet and it would have given us first non-NASA pictures of Mars as seen from the surface. IF, there was/is a NASA conspiracy to keep the true color of Mars secret from the general public, then Beagle 2 represented a big threat to those behind the conspiracy for obvious reasons. This context makes us wonder about the true nature of the failure of the European lander, doesn't it?

But there is potentially an additional twist to the current situation - because the situation of the 'timetable' has likely changed at this time. In other words, it is now desired that the general public wants to go to Mars. As discussed repeatedly here on Etemenanki before, the 'endgame' now unfolding has much to do with man's invasion of the Red Planet, as indicated also by the global Time River system (marking the 21st century as the 'end of history' associated with Mars where the timeline of human civilization jumps/splits).

And even the neo-conservative agenda is heavily intertwined here... because in addition to their preemptive policy designed to remake the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East in order to maintain American supremacy, help Israel, get their hands on more oil, and create a global 'Pax Americana' empire, the neo-cons' agenda calls for American domination of space... militarily. [This is no secret.] The neo-con chickenhawk cult, which includes prominent figures in the Bush administration like Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, Libby, Rumsfeld, etc., championed by Vice President Dick Cheney, want to militarize space.

This then brings us to the curious behind-the-scenes activities of Cheney who reportedly pushed for the release of Cydonia pictures some time ago, apparently for people like Hoagland and his followers. Why would he do this? The emerging theory is that the Cheney/neocon camp is trying to use the Cydonia issue (i.e. 'Face on Mars' etc.) as part of their covert propaganda campaign to generate public interest in going to Mars... and outer space in general. The catch here is of course that the neocon agenda is not about exploration, but exploitation and militarization. They want the US to go to outer space so that they can put weapons there - a big step toward the global domination of the US (New World Order) which would be by then resembling a fascist police state. [...]

If [...] there are forces pushing for the rise of the real space age (albeit from a military angle), it would no longer be necessary to make Mars appear so inhospitable. And therefore no need to make Mars so red (assuming they had been doing so in the first place). This creates a situation where they would want to show the 'true color' of Mars and yet this would have to be done 'gently' so as to not make it so obvious to people that there was a massive Mars 'conspiracy'.

One possible scenario that may unfold soon would be that 'they' will gradually make the new Martian pictures from Spirit/Opportunity less and less red and then comment - 'Hey look, it turns out that Mars is actually a lot like Earth... I guess all the pictures from the Martian surface so far had been affected by red dusts put into the atmosphere by storms... How interesting!' Well, I guess that just might work given how unquestioning the press and public have become these days. Who knows. [Update: This scenario has indeed unfolded to a large degree. See Hidden Colors of Mars.]

We can also probably look forward to a convenient discovery of strong evidence showing that there was/is indeed water and/or life on Mars. This would surely make headlines all over the world and get people excited. [Update: This too became reality. See here and here.]

Aside from those, there is the definitely related issue of the Bush administration presently considering kick-starting a program to send man back to the Moon and then to Mars. This announcement could come during Bush's State of the Union speech. (I'm sure Cheney is pushing this issue hard now inside the administration.) [Update: The announcement came in Jan. '04.]

So apparently the existing situation is such that we cannot wholeheartedly support the emerging push for more ambitious space projects - even though many of us do passionately want to see our space program try to go where no man has gone before.

Well, not that Mars is a totally alien land to mankind, of course. And our Genesis calls to us...

From January 26, 2004 post:

'Planet of War Profiteering'

[...] The 'conspiratorial' take on the current non-stop space developments expressed in my previous post (Jan. 7) - and I was not alone in having a serious suspicion - may have sounded a little farfetched to some around the time of Spirit's landing (January 3), but it seems more and more people are beginning to sense they are not being told the truth and something rather sinister is actually taking place just beneath the surface. And of course by mid-January when Bush officially vowed to revitalize the nation's space program (Jan. 14) it had hit the mainstream press (e.g. New York Times) that Cheney/PNAC was pushing the space/Mars ambition in the administration and that militarization of space was an undeniable but unmentionable goal. For instance, on Jan. 18 Reuters reported:

President Bush's plan to expand the exploration of space parallels U.S. efforts to control the heavens for military, economic and strategic gain. [...]

Bush's schedule for a U.S. return to the moon matches what experts say may be a dramatic militarization of space over the next two decades, even if the current ban on weapons holds.

Among other things, the Pentagon expects to spend at least $50 billion over the next five years to develop and field a multi-layered shield against incoming missiles that could deliver nuclear, biological or chemical weapons.

In a way more disturbing, it was also revealed that - get this - Halliburton, the notorious and corrupt oil company formerly headed by Cheney has also been a fan of space/Mars! (Go ahead, shake your head...) Increasingly Mars is looking like the next 'Iraq'. And you may recall that I have already discussed this Iraq-Mars parallel theme in my New Years Day post.

Here is a good piece from the Center for American Progress discussing the Cheney/PNAC/Halliburton agenda lurking behind the Martian curtain:

HALLIBURTON ACTIVELY PUSHING FOR MARS FUNDING: In the 4/24/00 edition of Oil & Gas Journal, Halliburton scientist Steve Streich pointed out why a Mars program would be so lucrative for Halliburton. He says a "Mars exploration program presents an unprecedented opportunity" for the industry and that it "warrants the support of both government and industry leaders." [...] Specifically, benefits for "the oil and gas industry may lie in technology that NASA will use for drilling into the surface of Mars." He says there is "great potential for a happy synergy between space researchers" on a Mars project and "the oil and gas industry."

HALLIBURTON ALREADY INVOLVED IN MARS PLANS: The 4/24/00 edition of Oil & Gas Journal also reported that Halliburton is already involved in a preliminary consortium of industry and academia "organized to support the development of new technology required for the Mars mission." A 2/28/01 report in Petroleum News confirmed that "NASA has been working with Halliburton and others to identify drilling technologies that might work on Mars." [...]

THE MILITARY MOTIVATION: On top of the Halliburton factor, USA Today reports that Cheney "persuaded Bush that there could be military benefits, such as space-based defense systems." This motivation was echoed by U.S. Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL) who said on the 1/9/04 edition of "Scarborough Country" that, "Somebody is going to dominate space.  When they do, just like when the British dominated the naval part of our globe, established their empire, just like the United States has dominated the air superiority, ultimately, whoever is able to dominate space will be able to control the destiny of the entire Earth."

Defense secretary Rumsfeld is a prominent member of Cheney's shadowy neocon PNAC network that has successfully hijacked the Bush administration (especially after 9/11), and as the following excerpt from The Daily MisLead shows Feeney above was only repeating a PNAC motto:

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld chaired the Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization four years ago. Rumsfeld was announced as Bush's choice for DoD Secretary weeks before the commission releasing its findings in January 2001. Rumsfeld's report found that "we know from history that every medium -- air, land and sea -- has seen conflict. Reality indicates that space will be no different." The panel also concluded that "given this virtual certainty, the [United States] must develop the means both to deter and to defend against hostile acts in and from space."

But this grand neocon plan to militarize and dominate space won't mean much if Bush/Cheney got ousted in the coming presidential election in November. And yet they are apparently going forward with it like it's a sure thing... as if they know they'll remain in power for another term. Presently poll numbers are not looking good for Bush. But there are certain types of events that can quickly change that situation, aren't there? And of course it's not like US Presidents, especially Bush, have to be actually elected by the American people to get into the White House.

Perhaps this year we'll get to the part where the people onboard the Titanic begin to panic. And we'll be screaming 'bastardo!'

From March 5, 2004 post:

'Tip of the Endgame Iceberg'

[In] the beginning period of 2004, Mars has become a regular face in the news because of the NASA rovers Spirit and Opportunity exploring the surface of the Red Planet since early January. And it was just three days ago on March 2 that NASA held a conference and made the big announcement, revealing hard evidence of past water on Mars.

This was fully anticipated, as I wrote on January 7:

We can also probably look forward to a convenient discovery of strong evidence showing that there was/is indeed water and/or life on Mars. This would surely make headlines all over the world and get people excited.

Well... Check! :)

In the same update I also wrote this concerning the issue of the color of Mars:

One possible scenario that may unfold soon would be that 'they' will gradually make the new Martian pictures from Spirit/Opportunity less and less red and then comment - 'Hey look, it turns out that Mars is actually a lot like Earth... I guess all the pictures from the Martian surface so far had been affected by red dusts put into the atmosphere by storms... How interesting!' Well, I guess that just might work given how unquestioning the press and public have become these days. Who knows.

If you've been following my 'Hidden Colors of Mars...' page, you know that this scenario indeed appears to be unfolding as well.

As already discussed before (see the Jan. 26 entry for instance), on the exoteric level the major driving force behind the sudden focus on Mars and space in general is the PNAC agenda championed by Cheney and his neoconservative minions. It's about militarization and exploitation of space. And yes, even Halliburton, the increasingly notorious oil company formerly headed by Cheney, is involved in the United States' sudden interest in Mars/space.

Oil, or energy in general, is indeed a big piece of the puzzle in all this. And that's probably an understatement. Let me put this in proper perspective: we are here literally looking at the closest thing to, if not literally, 'the end of the world'... because the world production of oil is peaking at this time. And once peaked, the industrial world is destined to totally collapse - much faster and more dramatically than we would have guessed.

This is 'Peak Oil'':

In a recent interview, Matthew Simmons... [energy adviser to Geroge W. Bush]... [w]hen asked if it was time for Peak Oil to become part of the public policy debate, Simmons responded:
It is past time. As I have said, the experts and politicians have no Plan B to fall back on. If energy peaks, particularly while 5 of the world’s 6.5 billion people have little or no use of modern energy, it will be a tremendous jolt to our economic well-being and to our health — greater than anyone could ever imagine.
When asked if there is a solution, Simmons responded:
I don’t think there is one. The solution is to pray. Under the best of circumstances, if all prayers are answered there will be no crisis for maybe two years. After that it’s a certainty.

And here is one theorized post-peak timeline:

1-5 years post-peak: Major recession comparable to those experienced during the artificially created oil shortages of the 1970's.

5-15 years post-peak: Recession worsens into a second Great Depression.

15-25 years post-peak: Society begins to collapse.  Conditions in the United States begin to resemble those in the modern day former U.S.S.R.

(It's speculated that this then leads to over 90% of the current human population dying off...)

The above timeline actually seems quite optimistic to me. Because chances are we will have World War III and/or nuclear detonations soon after Peak Oil. It's not like industrial nations will just sit back and deal with severe oil/energy shortage, as we can easily imagine.

So when does the peak of oil production come? Indications are that it already came in 2000...

Now you begin to wonder, don't you? Near the end of 2000, two oil men, Bush and Cheney, were installed in the White House through a very strange 'election'; early 2001 Cheney put together an energy task force to secretly discuss energy issues with those in the industry [...]; then soon after came '9/11'; and then thanks largely to the intelligence manipulation done by Cheney and his neoconservative network, the US was somehow to respond by invading Iraq, the land of... oil.

So we can't really avoid the question: Is there a connection between Peak Oil, Cheney's energy task force, 9/11, and Iraq? One thing is for certain: the seemingly insane actions - and there are many - taken by the Bush White House begin to make more sense when the answer is 'yes' to the above question. [...]

(Now, is there oil on Mars or not? Well, I'll just say there will be something...)

From March 9, 2004 post:

'Endgame In Space'

[...] Mars of course has been the cornerstone of our 'endgame' discussion since day one here at Etemenanki and so it was natural for us to view all the recent space developments, including the 'water on Mars' NASA announcement, as a significant step forward in the big 'game'. Consequently it was quickly inferred that the agenda to weaponize and exploit space was a key part of the grand 'endgame'.

Well, just yesterday posted a very timely article that seems to corroborate/enhance this view. It has to do with the insider knowledge of Wernher von Braun passed onto Carol Rosin, a Space and Missile Defense Consultant and a former Corporate Manager of Fairchild Industries. It concerns a grand 'game' being played by some cabal inside the United States. Wernher von Braun, as briefly mentioned in Endgame II, was director of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center who originally worked for the Third Reich.

We learn that Rosin told the Disclosure Project the following back in December 2000:

We first met in early 1974. At that time, Von Braun was dying of cancer but he assured me that he would live a few more years to tell me about the game that was being played- that game being the effort to weaponize space, to control the Earth from space and space itself. [...] Von Braun's purpose during the last years of his life, his dying years, was to educate the public and decision-makers about why space-based weapons are dumb, dangerous, destabilizing, too costly, unnecessary, unworkable, and an undesirable idea, and about the alternatives that are available. As practically a deathbed speech, he educated me about those concepts and who the players were in this game. He gave me the responsibility, since he was dying, of continuing this effort to prevent the weaponization of outer space.

We now see that this information was chillingly 'prophetic', especially when the following is added:

The strategy that Wernher Von Braun taught me was that first the Russians are going to be considered to be the enemy. [...] Then terrorists would be identified, and that was soon to follow. We heard a lot about terrorism. Then we were going to identify third-world country "crazies." We now call them Nations of Concern. But he said that would be the third enemy against whom we would build space-based weapons.

Keep in mind that this interview was recorded more than a year before 9/11. What comes after this, according to Rosin/von Braun, will be 'asteroids':

The next enemy was asteroids. Now, at this point he kind of chuckled the first time he said it. [...]

This is very curious given the ongoing 'Planet X' rumors going around in cyberspace.

So at this point it appears this supposed 'game' is unfolding very rapidly before our eyes. Indeed, Rosin tells us:

What he told me was that there is an accelerated effort in place. He didn't mention a timeline but he said that it was going to be speeding up faster than anybody could possibly imagine. That the effort to put weapons into space was not only based on a lie but would accelerate past the point of people even understanding it until it was already up there and too late.

This certainly sounds very realistic now. With all the Mars buzz and the fear created/sustained by the 'war on terror', going into space with weapons is getting much easier to accomplish at this time and it is already beginning...

Another thing we apparently can expect to emerge soon is the 'alien card', as Rosin stated:

And the funniest one of all was what he called aliens, extraterrestrials. That would be the final scare. And over and over and over during the four years that I knew him and was giving speeches for him, he would bring up that last card. "And remember Carol, the last card is the alien card. We are going to have to build space-based weapons against aliens and all of it is a lie." [...]

This would be a crazy idea if we weren't already living in a crazy world in a crazy period... And this would neatly tie in with the view expressed here at Etemenanki since early January that a carefully-controlled 'Mars disclosure' is likely unfolding now - the recent Mars water announcement being the latest example/confirmation of this process.

Rosin also stated:

What was most interesting to me was a repetitive sentence that he said to me over and over again during the approximately four years that I had the opportunity to work with him. He said the strategy that was being used to educate the public and decision makers was to use scare tactics. That was how we identify an enemy

'Scare tactics'... Well, in our post-9/11 world that's an eerily familiar theme, isn't it? Now, it is no secret that I've been critical of the Bush administration and I'm sure some readers have felt that I was getting overly 'political'. Hopefully, the above information helps get the idea across that the level of the issues we're dealing with here would go much deeper than the usual, silly 'conservative vs. liberal' political mentality.

Finally, if you're wondering about Carol Rosin's credibility, check out the following:

I [Rosin] am a Space and Missile Defense Consultant and have consulted to a number of companies, organizations, and government departments, even the intelligence community. I was a consultant to TRW working on the MX missile, so I was part of that strategy, which turned out to be a role model for how to sell space-based weapons to the public. The MX missile is yet another weapon system that we didn't need. I founded the Institute for Security and Cooperation in Outer Space, a Washington DC based think tank. I am an author and have testified before Congress and the President's Commission on Space.

That's pretty heavy credentials. And consequently we can't just ignore her heavy information - especially given all the events that took place after her pre-9/11 Disclosure interview...

We can take this as yet another clue telling us that the 'Endgame' is indeed in progress. Yep, time to wake up and smell the diminishing oil fields!

'Cuz they say two thousand zero zero party over
Oops out of time
So tonight I'm gonna party like it's 1999

- Prince

Well, close enough... We can still party like it's 2011! :)

[Back to main page]

'Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.'

© 2004 Goro Adachi