On the Chariot of the Sun
The highlighted part, I though, could be easily related to the Et in Arcadia ego theme. It turns out that the enigmatic phrase 'En in Arcadia ego' made its debut before Poussin in a painting by Il Guercino (c. 1618). And this features a skull with a bee perched on it. (Bigger image is here.) Although Skull and Bones' portrait does not feature a tomb (which is practically synonymous with 'Et in Arcadia ego'), it is kept in the 'Tomb', as the Bones headquarters is called. So there seems to be something more than mere coincidence involved here.
In the the Guercino, the phrase 'Et in Arcadia ego' - meaning 'And in Arcadia I' - is found directly below the skull which in turn is facing directly toward the viewer. This clarifies to some extent the meaning of the mysterious motto. The 'ego' part (i.e. 'I' as in 'me') can be understood to refers to the skull, that is, death. So we would have: 'Even in Arcadia death'. To put it another way, 'death is also to be found in Paradise; or, in the midst of earthly delights, the transience of life cannot be disregarded'.
Amazingly, this dark sentiment is clearly echoed by at least one of the mottos found in the Bones 'tomb'. As Robbins writes:
So it can be inferred that, if not a direct connection, then there is at least a common philosophy or mentality behind the Renaissance paintings and Bones tradition.
This view is encouraged by the medieval order of the Knights Templar, as we find that:
Another curious and somewhat disturbing clue is the fact that Skull and Bones has Germanic origins. It is even said that Bones is actually just the American chapter ('Chapter 322') of a German secret society, perhaps the infamous Bavarian Illuminati.
The significance here is that in previous Endgame articles we discussed the existence of a subtle swastika in Poussin's Et in Arcadia ego. The swastika is of course a symbol now inseparable from Nazi Germany.
While it's not clear whether Skull and Bones as an organization was/is pro-Nazis, we know for certain that George W. Bush's grandfather, a Bonesman, was a very active supporter of Hitler. It is also curious that the first President Bush served as head of the CIA, which has an unusually high number of Bonesmen and Yale graduates. It turns out that the intelligence agency (formerly the OSS) was more or less created originally 'by the Nazis for the Nazis'.
In the early days, the CIA headed by Allen Dulles, a dedicated follower of Hitler, was filled with former Nazis. This is because the CIA came into existence after the war partly for the purpose of giving a home to the 'Gehlen Org', the German intelligence network. Many members of the Third Reich were brought into the US spy service through Dulles' 'Operation Sunshine', including Richard Gehlen himself (of the Gehlen Org). Hundreds of Nazi scientists and specialists were also covertly recruited by the US via 'Project Paperclip'.
As discussed in Endgame II, Germany under Hitler was technologically very advanced and may even have succeeded in producing an antigravity or 'stargate' machine. In The Hunt For Zero Point (2001) journalist Nick Cook reveals his findings suggesting that the technological 'Holy Grail' was then likely seized by the US at the end of the war. Cook's scientist informant is quoted as saying:
Previously we discussed how this 'virus' would relate to the 2002 'alien crop glyph' bearing a coded message warning us about some Trojan Horse-like 'false gifts', i.e. a form of virus (see Endgame II).
It was then conjectured that the phrase 'Ultra-Tech' in the alien graphic above, presumably the model for the crop glyph design, was in effect becoming a reference to Nazi 'ultra'-technology. While the main focus was previously the 'stargate' technology, with the emergence of the CIA in our discussion we are now encouraged to pay attention to MK-ULTRA, the agency's infamous mind-control project stemming from the work of former Nazi scientists. This is quite literally 'ultra tech' seeded by the Third Reich. Could this association relate on some level to the Bush administration's uncanny ability to effectively manipulate public opinion through their massive and pretty much illegal propaganda campaign, orchestrated by Bush's 'co-president' Karl Rove?
In terms of 'viruses', we do find Nazi Germany right behind today's major diseases such as AIDS, as revealed in the book Emerging Viruses (1996) by Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz. What's striking here is the publisher of Emerging Viruses having the name 'Tetrahedron'. Let me remind you that there was a slightly altered version of the Ultra-Tech alien logo on the 'Watcher' website (shown right) which replaces the 'disk' with a rotating tetrahedron! And the tetrahedron is of course intimately associated with Mars/Cydonia, a major theme of the 'Endgame'.
This seemingly suggests that the 'warning' found encoded in the crop glyph was about some man-made viruses. In this light it's certainly curious that there was the world-wide SARS outbreak in 2003 which some suggested was a virus engineered in a lab somewhere. Some scientists even theorized that SARS came from outer space, which too would nicely echo the 'alien' aspect of the glyph design.
In Emerging Viruses, furthermore, is meticulously explained how the US military-medical-industrial complex absorbed many dark Nazi programs. A prominent company involved in this was the Merck pharmaceutical firm. Horowitz writes:
This is quite disturbing stuff.
Preston also states:
Now, to get back to George W. Bush, isn't it curious that the president of Merck at the time of the unholy collaboration was a 'George W.' (George W. Merck) who was even advising the US President at the time? Not that there is a deliberate design here, but coincidences like this do often hint at some tangible connections smoldering beneath the surface. Given the Bush family's documented German/Nazi associations, it is certainly natural for us to kind of wonder about the possibility of the current Bush presidency representing - if not literally then symbolically - the resurrection of the Third Reich, in effect the 'Fourth Reich', the seeds of which were planted in the US decades ago.
There is indeed a striking parallel between Bush and Hitler.
While there are many differences between the two leaders, lately people are increasingly becoming amused and/or alarmed by the growing similarities.
Many in the US are still in denial about this, but the reality is that George W. Bush is quite plausibly the intellectually weakest US President the nation has seen. In that sense, Bush is no Hitler. He is in the White House largely because of his last name and the 'evil genius' Karl Rove, aka 'Bush's Brain'. He is in the White House because he happens to make a good front man, through whom unelected ideologues could wield their power covertly.
Is this too harsh and sinister a view of the Bush presidency? Perhaps. But what makes it uncomfortably real is the existence of the 'neo-conservatives' - the 'hawks' - surrounding Bush today who are behind the Bush doctrine of preemptive attacks and the general arrogant aggressiveness exhibited by the administration. This group includes Vice President Dick Cheney, defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz (deputy defense secretary), Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff), Richard Perle (senior adviser to president), Douglas Feith (undersecretary of defense for policy), etc.
While most Americans are satisfied with the idea that the toppling of the Iraqi regime this spring was a directly result of '9/11', the truth is that the invasion of Iraq had been a dream of neo-cons long before the historic terror attacks took place in 2001. Indeed, as early as 1992 Wolfowitz and Libby wrote a paper ('Defense Planning Guidance') which became the basis for 'Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century' (2000) by PNAC (Project for a New American Century), a neo-con think tank, which strongly advocated taking military action against Iraq as a key step toward achieving a 'Pax Americana'.
Although literally meaning 'American peace', Pax Americana is about global domination by the United States. It's about building an American empire based on the presumption that the American way is the best way and that the US could do no wrong ('might is right').
The most worrisome aspect of the neo-con ideology is that just beneath the surface it goes directly against traditional American values such as freedom and basic human rights. As those who have carefully followed the Bush administration (i.e. beyond the mainstream media propaganda) should know, the White House used the fear created by '9/11' to make Congress pass the 'USA PATRIOT ACT' which allows the government to take away various individual rights from the American people (proposed 'PATRIOT Act II' is worse). As it foreshadows a police state so much, thus un-American, that some US cities are even hesitating to comply with the new law.
It is a quite telling that people are increasingly comparing the Bush administration to the fascist Nazi regime. The definition of fascism is: 'A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism'. Well, it does sound familiar doesn't it?
But here is something that makes the comparison more real. It turns out that the neo-conservatives in power in and around the administration reportedly have a ideological vision handed down from a pro-fascist philosopher named Leo Strauss (1899-1973) who taught at the University of Chicago. As pointed out by the Lyndon LaRouche camp, before coming to the US Strauss lived in Germany where he directly interacted with, and was heavily influenced by, the leading Nazi ideologue Martin Heidegger and the Nazi legal architect Carl Schmitt. Although a Jew, Strauss' mentality was very much in tune with that of the Nazis. Many of the neo-conservatives - such as Paul Wolfowitz, the architect of the Iraq war - are said to be 'Straussians', which nicely explains their fascist tendencies.
So the emerging picture is that we have a US President with connections to Germany/Nazism (through family and Skull & Bones) surrounded by neo-cons whose ideology can be traced back to the Third Reich. Is it any wonder then that almost everything the United States does these days under the control of the Bush administration - such as the unprovoked 'preemptive' war and 'Patriot Act' - is decidedly un-American? And let's not forget the fact that George W. Bush was not really elected by the American people. From the very beginning, the Bush presidency was anti-democratic and in opposition to what the United States stands for.
The United States, it may even be said, was hijacked by closet 'neo-Nazis' in 2001. Hopefully this is more symbolic than actual...
In the earlier Endgame installments we discussed the significance of December 2002. According to our projected future timeline, the 'December window' was to produce the fall of the Babylon leader(s). While the scenario deemed likely was the US president or Pope going down, what actually took place was the fall of US Republican leader Trend Lott and Cardinal Bernard Law of Boston's Catholic Archdiocese. (These were two of the biggest events in the US during December '02.) In other words, the projected pattern did manifest, but in a downgraded form.
Another significant event that occurred during the 'December window' was the announcement of the birth of the first cloned human baby. As already explained in Endgame IV, this suspected hoax by Clonaid, a company affiliated with the alien cult 'Raelians', was nicely in line with the symbolic themes carried by the December window (such as 'false gifts', ETs, etc.).
Curiously, the Raelians believe that mankind was created by ETs through genetic engineering. This has a lot in common with the Nazi/Aryan perspective which similarly involved extraterrestrial intelligence creating divine-human hybrid beings through genetic manipulation - an event associated with the Atlantis myth. The supposed superiority of the 'Aryan race' as claimed by Hitler was based on this mythical thinking.
The Aryan mythology can be traced back to Helena Petrovna Blavatsky - the author of Isis Unveiled and The Secret Doctrine published in the late nineteenth century - who founded the influential Theosophical Society. Her esoteric ideas were subsequently picked up by the Thule Society - a front for the Germanenorden (German Order), an occult, anti-Semitic, and nationalist organization that played a crucial role in giving rise to Hitler and Nazism. The connection is evident in the logo of the Thule Society, which was the swastika (shown over a sword).
Amazingly, the original symbol of the Raelians too featured a swastika, woven into the Star of David (see right). Combined with its December window association, this implies that the current world situation does have something to do with the Third/Fourth Reich. In particular, it has the function of underscoring the fascist nature of the Bush administration. This is because the neo-conservatives currently making aggressive policies for Bush are a largely Jewish/Zionist group (as can be seen from that fact that most neo-cons belong to JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs). They could be described as 'Judeo Nazis' - or perhaps more accurately, 'fascist Zionists' - thus perfectly reflecting the combination of the swastika and the Star of David (symbol of Israel) displayed by the Raelian logo.
Bush, the leader, being surrounded by Jews/Zionists is quite fitting in that the leader of the Jews would archetypally be Moses - whom I have already identified with George W. Bush (I did so first at the time of the 2000 presidential election).
As discussed in my article The Two Suns of Election MM (2000), what I had first noticed were some intriguing symbolic connections between the Clinton presidency and Solomon, an important biblical figure (King David's son) responsible for building the Temple for the Ark of the Covenant in Jerusalem. This in turn made Clinton analogous to an 18th-Dynasty ancient Egyptian king named Amenhotep III (c. 1405-1367 BC), in that researcher Ahmed Osman had plausibly identified this king with Solomon in his books (Out of Egypt, etc.). And because Amenhotep III was succeeded by Akhenaten, whom Osman and others had equated (or at least associated) with Moses, I conjectured that George W. Bush, Clinton's successor, could be viewed as a version of Akhenaten/Moses. (Various other symbolic clues supported this view.)
In light of the decidedly un-American nature of the Bush presidency demonstrated repeatedly since the election, we can see that the above comparison was indeed very potent. Akhenaten ('Moses'), after all, is a notorious 'heretic king' who went against the traditional ways of ancient Egypt; as I wrote in the Two Suns article:
And of course the Osirian nature of Bush intensifies the connection, as pharaohs - including Akhenaten - were traditionally regarded as the earthly representation of Horus (while living) and Osiris (when dead).
Moreover, Akhenaten's apparent obsession with the Benben Stone, the archetypal pyramid capstone, resonates with the Bush family's close connection with the so-called 'New World Order', said to be symbolized by the 'All-Seeing Eye' at the apex of the pyramid depicted on the back of the US dollar bill. (It signifies the 'stargate' as well.)
We find that the Aten heresy of Akhenaten somehow seems to have come to be considered a form of disease or virus, especially after the rebel king's reign:
As the Aten was a sun-disk, the heresy was in a way a 'solar virus'. This again brings to mind the SARS virus that suddenly emerged around the time of the Iraq war. SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) is said to be a form of 'coronavirus'. The term 'corona' refers to the luminous ring seen around a celestial body, especially the sun (the envelope of highly ionized gas outside the chromosphere of the sun). Hence SARS could be interpreted as a 'solar virus'.
Since the invasion of Iraq was a war zealously and solely wanted by the Bush administration (only weakly supported by the 'coalition of the bullied and bought'), its overlapping timing with the SARS epidemic certainly encourages the Bush-Akehenaten-Moses equation. (Note that there was a real plague during/around Akhenaten's reign, and the biblical account of the Exodus - led by Moses - also involves plagues.)
Combined with SARS' rumored extraterrestrial origin and Akhenaten's obsession with the Benben Stone (theorized to have been a meteorite), we are here reminded of the intertwined 'cosmic virus' and 'false gift' themes, which in turn are related to Mars. While the Benben Stone is not necessarily a Martian rock, the archetypal 'false gift' is the Trojan Horse of Greek myth that is inseparable from a character namedOdysseus (discussed in Homer's epic, The Odyssey); and it just happens that the NASA Mars probe currently orbiting the Red Planet (which in 2002 gave us a key IR picture of Cydonia) is named 'Odyssey'.
And then there is the fact that the Great Sphinx guarding the Giza pyramids, which are gigantic representations of the Benben Stone, traditionally embodies Mars as well as the sun. This is echoed by Akhenaten being obsessed with both the Benben Stone and the Sphinx (=Mars). Adding to this is the fact that Akkhenaten's sun-disk god Aten was formerly called Re-harakhty ('Horus of the Horizon') which was one of the epithets given to the Sphinx.
The insistent blending of Mars, the sun, and the Sphinx/lion is repeated by the 'stargate'/duat configuration we'll witness in the sky this summer (late Aug. 2003).
As discussed in Endgame IV, around August 23 and at sunrise, the leonine sun-Regulus conjunction and brilliantly shining Mars (being closest to Earth in recorded history) will become a celestial manifestation of the aker-lions, the guardians of the gateway to the Osirian realm of the dead (duat). The sun and Leo will be rising on the east horizon and Mars will be setting on the western horizon.
The celestial configuration even relates to the Aten in that, as Re-harakhty, the god 'embodied the dual aspects of the double horizon - the solar disc in the west at sunset and in the east at sunrise'. This suggests that the 'stargate window' marked by the 'aker configuration' is relevant to Akhenaten, thus also to George Bush.
So we are coming back to the original hypothesis of Bush having much to do with the opening of the 'stargate' or the 'tomb of Osiris' this year. And we are beginning to see a clearer picture of this suggested big event.
What does the opening of the Osirian tomb, or the resurrection of the death god, mean for the the Osirian president Bush? The most straightforward interpretation would be that Bush will be 'resurrected'. But that doesn't make much sense in that to be resurrected one would have to be dead first. The key here is this: the Egyptian resurrection theme is a little twisted in that the restoration of Osiris takes place in the duat-underworld of the dead. In other words, Osiris is reborn into the death realm. Resurrection, therefore, would simply mean 'death' in a sense. (The resurrection into the living realm is done through the birth of Horus, Osiris' son by Isis.)
So the implication would be that the coming 'stargate window' is to involve the 'death of Bush'. But this doesn't have to be taken literally. The apparent essence of the message with regard to Bush is 'this is the end of the road'.
The interpretation is further encouraged by the celestial positioning of Eridanus, a constellation representing the river of the underworld, accompanying the late-August 'stargate' configuration.
While the Regulus-Sun-Jupiter-Venus conjunction and the Red Planet will be marking the eastern and western horizons simultaneously, Eridanus will be positioned (as seen from Giza) directly to the south with the lowest star named 'Achernar', meaning 'End of the River', placed right at the horizon. (See image below.) Now consider this: 1) the horizon is in effect a line separating this world and the 'underworld'; and 2) Eridanus is the 'River of Orion', thus also the 'river of Osiris'. So the 'End of the River' (of the underworld) pinpointing the threshold of the death realm conveys the idea of 'the end of Osiris'.
The relevance of Eridanus here is dramatically increased by two other things. First, Eridanus is often identified with the Euphrates river flowing through Iraq, the very nation the US just invaded. The 'end of Eridanus' signified by Achernar would therefore be analogous to the mouth of the Tigris-Euphrates river - which happens to be precisely at 30°N latitude. As discussed in Endgame IV, the position is very meaningful in that the eternal gaze of the 'Martian monument' at Giza (also on 30°N), the Great Sphinx, is fixed due east and thus perfectly aligned with the 'end' of the Tigris-Euphrates. The Sphinx is also traditionally the guardian of the Osirian tomb (represented at Giza by the pyramids) so as to perfectly accord with the 'end of Osiris' theme.
Second, Eridanus is mythologically considered the tomb of Phaėthon, naturally an alter ego of Osiris-Saturn-Prometheus. The tale of Phaėthon wanting to ride the 'chariot of the sun' across the heavens is told in Greek myth.
The chariot of the sun, we learn, was owned by his father Helios, who wouldn't let his son ride it because this was just too dangerous. But Phaėthon strongly insisted and was eventually able to get his father's permission. The result was inevitable he quickly lost control, and now the world was in danger of being set on fire. This dire situation prompted Zeus to strike Phaėthon with his thunderbolt, which threw him off the chariot. And like a shooting star Phaėthon fell into the stream of Eridanus. The Eridanus thus became the grave of Phaėthon.
As Phaėthon is said to be an alter ego of Saturn, thus also that of Osiris, Eridanus becomes just another name for the tomb of Osiris. And we also find the strong emphasis on the sun in the story - the 'chariot of the sun' and Phaėthon's father being Helios the sun-god - very appropriate.
The tale of Phaėthon is even comparable to the Bush presidency. The 'chariot of the sun' would correspond to the office of the President, which was held by George W. Bush's father, i.e. 'Helios', just a decade ago. Like Phaėthon, Bush Jr. is rapidly destabilizing the world with his 'might is right' doctrine. And following the parallel, the next step would be Bush being struck down by a 'thunderbolt'. Well, is this what's scheduled to take place for the 'stargate window'?
It is quite telling that the Iraq war was immediately preceded by the space shuttle Columbia falling from the sky like a meteorite - like Phaėthon. 'Columbia' is another name for the United States and it derives from 'Columba', i.e. Noah's dove. As the dove is a universal symbol of peace, the Columbia disaster can be interpreted as an omen for the destruction of 'American peace'.
Amazingly, 'American peace' is exactly what is meant by 'Pax Americana' - the US global domination envisioned by the neo-conservatives now in power in the Bush administration. The invasion of Iraq was the first major step toward achieving the Pax Americana. So the symbolic implication of the space-shuttle omen would be that the Bush administration's global ambition will lead to a major disaster. This, again, is likely relevant to the coming 'stargate window'.
It's worth noting that Akhenaten's 'Pax Americana' - i.e. the Aten heresy (Amarna revolutionn) - was also unsuccessful and had a short life. Akhenaten himself was probably removed by a military coup. The theorized identification of Akhenaten with Moses, the leader of the Jews, fits here nicely, as we read in Genesis that the dove Columba - embodied by the destroyed space shuttlee - comes back to Noah with an olive branch, a symbol closely associated with the Jewish people. This relates to the fact that many neo-conservatives are Jewish/Zionist and the fact that the ill-fated Columbia mission was notable for carrying onboard the first Israeli astronaut.
Even though Moses was supposedly a Hebrew, his interchangeability with Akhenaten would make him a non-Jew, which resonates with Bush being a born-again fundamentalist Christian surrounded by neo-con Jews and Zionists. (The Bush administration is pretty much a incestuous cult of Judeo-Christian fanatics.) Combined with Bush's messiah complex, it is even possible to view the administration as reenacting the story of Jesus, the 'king of the Jews'. And we know how this story ends: the Jews along with Romans crucified the rebel leader.
This then makes us wonder about the nature of Bush's relationship with the neo-cons. Will Bush be 'sacrificed' by his own people in some way?
The apparent fusion of Jesus, Akhenaten, andPhaėthon via Bush is curiously echoed by the Talmud sometimes referring to Jesus as 'Ben Pandira' ('son of Pandira'). As 'Pandira' is the Hebrew form of an ancient Egyptian royal title meaning 'the (sun-) god Ra', 'Ben Pandira' would denote 'son of the sun', or 'son of Helios'. And the 'son of Helios' is none other than Phaėthon.
It is also intriguing to find that researcher Ahmed Osman has boldly identified Jesus with Tutankhamun, i.e. 'King Tut', who ascended the throne soon after Akhenaten. (The two were likely blood relatives.) And here, too, evidence strongly suggests that the king was murdered.
One of the Bush administration's first major international activities following the Iraq invasion was the release of the so-called 'road map to peace' for the Israelis and Palestinians. (It was quickly answered by intensified violence in the region.) As a version of 'Moses' /'Jesus', it is only fitting that Bush turned his attention to the 'Promised Land', i.e. Israel, at this critical time.
Fitting indeed. Notice that the name 'Israel' comes from one of Isaac's sons, originally called Jacob. As discussed in Endgame IV, Jacob is a key figure in the 'stargate' scheme. In Genesis we read:
We have already discussed how the 'pillar-stone gate' relates to the Tower of Babel (in Babylon) as well as the Benben Stone. But let me point out again that Babylon is today's Iraq, and the Benben Stone is inseparable from Osirian resurrection and Bush/Akhenaten. And it happens that Cairo - the Egyptian capital sitting next to Giza, the site closely associated with all the key themes - was once called 'Babylon' (meaning 'gate of the gods'). (Today's name, Cairo, denotes 'Mars'.)
In light of the very Martian nature of the 'stargate window' that will open the gate to the duat-underworld or the 'house of God' this summer/fall, it's plausible that Israel will be a key part of the event. (Conceptually, the fall of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, as well as the Pope or even Tony Blair, would be more or less interchangeable with the fall of Bush - both being a 'Babylon leader'.)
The emerging Israel-Mars overlap is also hinted by the Star of David, the Jewish symbol. As already pointed out by others, the six-pointed star (or two interlocking equilateral triangles) may be viewed as a two-dimensional representation of two circumscribed interlocking tetrahedrons, i.e. the configuration from which derives the 'message of Cydonia', 19.5 degrees.
In Endgame IV was discussed how this '19.5 degrees' is also pinpointed by the Nile, the literal river of time (see my book The Time Rivers). More specifically, the latitude 19.5°N is marked by the river's 'Great Bend' which in turn would be associated with the Osirian 'House of Sokar', or 'House of God' of Jacob (= Israel). (See Endgame IV or my book for more on this.)
Israel's relevance is reinforced further by its founding phase in the early 1900s overlapping the sensational discovery of the tomb of Tutankhamun (1922) - in effect a tomb of Osiris/Jesus ('Hosee of God'). Not only that, the two events seem to have directly influenced each other behind the scenes as discussed in the 2002 book Tutankhamun: The Exodus Conspiracy by Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald.
The book's argument is basically that undisclosed papyrus documents supposedly found inside Tutankhamun's tomb contained an account of the Exodus that did not conform to the biblical version and thus could undermine the Jewish people's claimed right to occupy Palestine. It is suggested that the mysterious deaths of those involved in the tomb discovery were likely a result of assassinations designed to suppress the 'dangerous' information that could ruin Zionists' dream. And of course the 'true' version of the Exodus story withheld from the public is theorized to have involved Akhenaten - potentially King Tut's father - as the main Mosaic figure.
It is interesting to realize here that the founding of Israel was not sought solely by the Zionists. Another major driving force behind the dream was Britain which was very much under the influence of scriptural prophecy concerning the Day of Reckoning, supposedly the time of the 'Second Coming' of Christ. It was believed that according to the Bible this could take place only after the Jews have returned to Zion (Jerusalem), and thus British statesmen's twisted interest in creating a Jewish home in the Holy Land.
The man most responsible for the creation of Israel, the 'father of Israel', was Baron Edmond de Rothschild (1845-1934) who established the Jewish Colonial Trust - the first Zionist bank - to buy territories in Palestine. Ironically, the powerful Rothschild international banking empire was also partly responsible for the 'problematic' discovery of Tutankhamun's tomb. It turns out that the fifth Earl of Carnarvon, who along with Howard Carter discovered the tomb, was married to the illegitimate daughter of Alfred Rothschild, a grandson of the British branch of the House of Rothschild. And many of his excavations in Egypt 'were unquestionably funded from money supplied to Lady Carnarvon by Alfred de Rothschild'.
Like many other players in the 'endgame', the Rothschilds are Jewish and originally from Germany. The banking family can be traced back to Baron Mayer Amshel Rothschild (1744-1812), a Jewish banker/financier from Frankfurt. From there the House of Rothschild became the most powerful banking family in Europe. One of the its members, Baron Edmond de Rothschild, eventually became the 'father of Israel' as mentioned, though not all Rothschilds have been Zionists.
Inevitably this makes us wonder about the deep involvement of Zionists, Britain, and 'George W. Christ' in the recent (and on-going) Iraq war and the increasingly shaky stated reasons for the invasion (WMD, liberation, etc.).
What's more bizarre is the uncomfortably plausible theory that the Rothschilds played a key role in giving rise to Hitler and the Third Reich. It is well documented that the fascist dictator was strongly supported by Western industrial and banking circles which 'guaranteed Hitler's success'. And of course, George W.'s grandfather was one of those who eagerly helped Hitler. Although Hitler was openly against the Rothschilds - and Jews in general - 'the emerging Nazi power continued to find support in Britain, even within the Rothschild-dominated Bank of England'.
All this helps us see more clearly the symbolic relevance of the Raelians, the ET/cloning cult that came to our attention through our 'December window' (of 2002). Their original symbol showing the swastika within the Star of David - in effect Nazism embedded within Zion - nicely illustrates the strange alliance between Germany/Nazis/fascism and Israel/Rothschilds/Zionism. And the Raelians' interest in genetic engineering and cloning ties in well with what Nazism was really about: in Hitler's words, 'it is the determination to create a new man'.
The same configuration is formed by the Bush administration, i.e. a Germanic 'messiah' surrounded by neo-conservative Zionists. And this spells trouble - not just for the world but also for Bush himself. It is instructive to look at recent two cases where the US President was ousted - namely John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon.
In the case of John F. Kennedy, according to a plausible theory:
It is helpful to know that JFK's father was anti-Jewish and pro-Hitler. But what JFK did was basically go against the global elite, which proved deadly for him. Note also that, like Bush, JFK was almost a messianic figure (his presidency was called 'Camelot' for instance).
As for Nixon, who was forced out of the White House in 1973, the key person was his right-hand man Henry Kissinger, yet another German-born Jew and a regular face in conspiracy theories concerning the 'New World Order'. For example, we are told:
So like the JFK assassination, we seem to find here a hidden influence of the Zionist and NWO agenda. Combined with the apparent involvement of George Bush Sr. (Kissinger's protégé) in Watergate, we can't help but wonder about the possibility of George W. Bush - given his weak intelligence - being another 'stooge' used by the hidden Elite and the neo-con Zionists.
That it was the year 1973 also adds more weight to the view that there will potentially be a Watergate-type event this year (2003). Recall that the esoteric 'Stargate Conspiracy' pinpoints the year 2003 as the conclusion of some 'programming' that began in 1973 (see Endgame IV). Curiously, 1973 also happens to be when the 'godfather of neo-conservatives', Leo Strauss, died, as well as when the Raelian cult was founded.
On May 1 ('03), Bush - a draft dodger - made a shameless 'Top Gun' landing on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier in military uniform and announced to the nation and the world that the United States' main mission in Iraq was over.
This was obviously a big moment for the presidency - carefully stage-managed and all - which makes the selection of the USS Abraham Lincoln unlikely to be a result of chance or practicality. It was obviously meant to carry a symbolic message. Indeed, besides the aura of greatness that comes with Lincoln's name, the Civil War president happens to be a hero of neo-conservatives (along with Ronald Reagan). The neo-cons worship Lincoln. And Bush was advised (by the neo-cons?) to make his 'heroic' speech on the warship Lincoln. (Nice little pun, eh?)
That the occasion was designed to be special, especially in the hidden esoteric context, was made more evident by the scriptural reference used in Bush's speech. As has been pointed out:
So, regardless of Bush's awareness of the implication (I doubt he was in on it), the big show was apparently intended to make a 'Messiah' out of Bush. In other words, it was a little 'Second Coming'.
The bad news is, the story is unlikely to end well for the 'king'. After all, Jesus' ministry ended quickly with his crucifixion.
It may be relevant here that the Bush administration began to focus on the issue of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict soon after the big speech by delivering the peace 'road map'. While it's unlikely that the Zionist neo-cons around Bush were/are serious about making peace with the Palestinians by giving up some lands, there have been some news reports suggesting Bush (who is not as ideologically driven) may be becoming quite sympathetic to the Palestinian side. This cannot be a good development for the ruthless neo-con gang. Is it possible that they will 'crucify' Bush for his potential 'betrayal'?
Also at this time there is growing criticism of how intelligence was twisted by the Bush team in order to drag the nation into war. The man to be considered most responsible for the manipulation would be the President. And it does seem entirely possible that Bush will be removed from office because of this.
There was another ominous event emerging from Iraq. This was the toppling of the Saddam statue in Baghdad (another staged event for the media), which was meant to signify the fall of the Saddam regime. The 'Babylon leader' parallel we have been detecting between Saddam and Bush was seemingly acknowledged here by the US military personnel placing a US flag over the statue's head before bringing it down to the ground. The Saddam statue was soon 'decapitated' and the detached head was dragged through the streets. Was this foreshadowing what will happen to Bush?
Interestingly, the notion of 'decapitation' was also present at the very opening of the war. Recall that the first US strike against Iraq on March 20 - a key Mars/Sphinx day - was a rushed 'decapitation attack' intended to kill Saddam.
Even the pyramidal capstone theme (All-Seeing Eye, etc.), symbolic of Osirian resurrection, seems to be associated with decapitation via the Isis head placed at the apex of the pyramid in the 'House of Sokar' depiction.
What's more, the US decapitation attack on the 'Mars/Sphinx day' brings our attention to the fact that the 'Martian Sphinx', i.e. the 'Face on Mars', is a decapitated head. And of course, as revealed in Endgame III, the 'Face' turns out to be a very 'messianic' monument comparable to the celebrated Shroud of Turin (supposedly showing the image of Jesus).
The Shroud, in turn, shows an awkward and seemingly detached head, which has been theorized to be that of Leonardo Da Vinci (a possible creator the Shroud). And Leonardo, 'keeper of the Grail', is closely associated with John the Baptist (see Endgame III), the decapitated forerunner of Jesus.
Dizzy yet? :)
What we seem to be detecting here is a message telling us that the coming 'stargate window' may produce a major 'decapitation event' involving Bush, the Osirian messiah of Babylon. But this is a potential scenario. There are other variations and possibilities.
It is perhaps useful to watch what happens on/around June 24 ('03), the feast of John the Baptist. As discussed in Endgame IV, there will be a Sun-Saturn conjunction on that day at the 'stargate' region of the sky (i.e. an ecliptic-Milky Way intersection) marked by Orion (=Osiris). And this configuration will resemble the Statue of Liberty with the sun corresponding to the torch - thus seemingly alluding to relevance of the US. (Click on image right.) The torch is also very evocative of Promethean fire, a form of 'false gift', one of the key 'Endgame' themes.
If I am reading the pattern right, it is very possible that what happens on/around June 24 will be a 'preview event' of a bigger event that may be scheduled for the 'stargate window' this summer/fall.
© 2003 by Goro Adachi
 Alexandra Robbins, Secrets of the Tomb (New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2003), pp.87-9.
 Richard Andrews and Paul Schellenberger, The Tomb of God (New York: Little, Brown and Company, 1996), pp.86-8.
 Robbins, Secrets of the Tomb, p.89.
 Andrews and Schellenberger, The Tomb of God, p.109.
 Robbins, Secrets of the Tomb, p.89.
 John J. Robinson, Born in Blood (New York: M. Evans & Company, 1989), p.170.
 Ibid., p.342.
 quoted in ibid., p.342.
 Andrew Collins, Gods of Eden (London: Headline Book Publishing, 1998), pp.160-4.
 Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald, Tutankhamun: The Exodus Conspiracy (Virgin Books, 2002), p.163.
 Collins, Gods of Eden, p.150.
 Ibid., p.150.
 Giorgio de Santillana and Hertha von Dechend, Hamlet's Mill (Boston: David R. Godine, 1977), pp.265-6.
 Ahmed Osman, Out of Egypt (Arrow Books, 1999), pp.116-7.
 Ibid., pp.160-1, 217.
 Ibid., pp.166-7.
 Collins and Ogilvie-Herald, Tutankhamun, p.271.
 Ibid., p.272.
 Ibid., p.278.
 Jim Marrs, Rule by Secrecy (New York: HarperCollins, 2000), pp.163-9.
 Ibid., p.165.
 Ibid., pp.167-8.
 David Icke, ...and the truth shall set you free (Bridge of Love Publications, 1998), pp.280-1.
 Ibid., pp.308-9.